首页> 外文会议>2012 IEEE/OES Baltic International Symposium >The regime shift in the Baltic Sea area — Caused by the change of the NAO sign?
【24h】

The regime shift in the Baltic Sea area — Caused by the change of the NAO sign?

机译:波罗的海地区的政权转移-是由NAO标志的变化引起的吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In the Baltic Sea area during the late 1980s air and sea surface temperature increased. A longer growing season and increases in phytoplankton biomass as well as changes in the zooplankton and fish communities accompanied this. These changes are supposed to represent a regime shift in the ecology of the central Baltic Sea that could have been caused by a related sign change in the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) index. But the NAO has changed sign more frequently and most of the time no corresponding regime shift did occur therefore we should check this hypothesis more thorough. We investigated additional to the NAO a broad range of variables including air temperature, sea surface temperature, phytoplankton and zooplankton biomass, fish abundance and oxygen. The time series data are analyzed with respect to autocorrelation, linear trends and the occurrence of breakpoints whereby always tests for statistical significance are conducted. Tests for structural breakpoints in these time series reveal for some of the investigated variables the existence of such breakpoints in the 70–80 ties of the last century. But surprisingly in many physical and biological variables and in the most common climate indices no clear breakpoints can be identified. Specifically the change of the NAO sign around 1987, which is proposed to be the reason for an ecological regime shift in the Baltic Sea is not statistically significant. The coincidence of the sign change and an ecological regime shift could just be pure random, but even the evidence for a clear ecological regime shift is missing. In summary we strongly advocate to apply sound statistical procedures for detecting regime shifts instead of eye fitting and qualitative descriptions. A strong hypothesis like the postulation of a regime shift 1987 caused by the change in the NAO sign does require strong evidence, but it seems we might not have that.
机译:在1980年代后期,波罗的海地区的空气和海面温度升高。随之而来的是更长的生长季节,浮游植物生物量的增加以及浮游动物和鱼类群落的变化。这些变化被认为代表了波罗的海中部生态系统的变化,这可能是由于北大西洋涛动(NAO)指数的相关符号变化引起的。但是NAO更频繁地改变符号,并且在大多数情况下没有发生相应的政权转移,因此我们应该更彻底地检查这一假设。除了NAO,我们还研究了广泛的变量,包括气温,海面温度,浮游植物和浮游动物的生物量,鱼的丰度和氧气。分析时间序列数据的自相关性,线性趋势和断点的发生,从而始终进行统计显着性检验。在这些时间序列中对结构性断点进行的测试揭示了一些研究变量中上个世纪70-80年代这种断点的存在。但是令人惊讶的是,在许多物理和生物学变量以及最常见的气候指数中,都没有明确的断点。特别是1987年左右NAO标志的变化,这被认为是波罗的海生态状况发生变化的原因,在统计上并不显着。符号变化和生态系统变化的巧合可能只是纯粹的随机性,但甚至缺少明显的生态系统变化的证据。总而言之,我们强烈主张采用合理的统计程序来检测政权转移,而不是用眼睛适应和定性描述。一个强有力的假设,例如由NAO标志变化引起的1987年政权更迭的假设,确实需要有力的证据,但似乎我们可能没有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号