首页> 外文会议>2010 International Conference on Body Sensor Network >Ultrasonic vs. Inductive Power Delivery for Miniature Biomedical Implants
【24h】

Ultrasonic vs. Inductive Power Delivery for Miniature Biomedical Implants

机译:微型生物医学植入物的超声与感应功率传输

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this paper we compare two methods of wireless power delivery to implanted microdevices: ultrasonically and via inductive coupling. We build models for both methods and compare them in terms of power transmission efficiency, for different separations and receiver sizes. The simulation results show that at small distances between source and receiver (1 cm) the inductive system outperforms the ultrasonic one (efficiency of 81% vs. 39% for a receiver of 10 mm diameter). At larger distances (10 cm) the efficiencies of both systems reduce significantly, but the ultrasonic system demonstrates much better performance (0.2% vs. 0.013% for a 10 mm receiver). As the receiver gets smaller this gap increases drastically (0.02% vs. 0.02Ȃ2;10^-3% for a 2 mm receiver) while the distance after which the ultrasonic system outperforms the inductive one reduces (from 2.9 cm for a 10 mm receiver to 1.5 cm for a 5 mm receiver).
机译:在本文中,我们比较了无线电力传输和植入式微型设备的两种方法:超声方法和感应耦合方法。我们针对这两种方法建立模型,并针对不同的距离和接收器的大小在功率传输效率方面进行比较。仿真结果表明,在源和接收器之间的距离很小(1 cm)时,感应系统的性能优于超声系统(效率为81%,而直径为10 mm的接收器的效率为39%)。在更大的距离(10厘米)处,两个系统的效率都会大大降低,但是超声波系统的性能要好得多(10毫米接收器为0.2%,而0.013%)。随着接收器的变小,该间隙急剧增加(0.02%vs.0.02Ȃ2; 2 mm接收器为10 ^ -3%),而超声波系统胜过感应系统的距离减小(10mm接收器为2.9 cm对于5毫米接收器为1.5厘米)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号