首页> 外文会议>2009 International Forum on Porous Flow and Applications(第十届全国渗流力学学术会议) >Digital Experiment Steam and Incondensable Gas-assisted Gravity Push on Heavy Oil
【24h】

Digital Experiment Steam and Incondensable Gas-assisted Gravity Push on Heavy Oil

机译:在重油上进行蒸汽和不凝气体辅助重力的数字实验

获取原文

摘要

Numerical simulation method is applied to study the procedure of Steam and incondensablegas-assisted gravity push(SAGP)on heavy oil,the parameters of the process.such as temperature andsaturation distribution.etc are obtained,the simulation results are analyzed and compared withsteam-assisted gravlty drainage(SAGD)on the same condition,some conclusions are drawn as follows:(1)during the upward spreading of steam chamber,the vertical expanding speed of SAGD is quickerthan SAGp,but its horizontal expanding speed is slower;(2)in this two technology,the cumulative oilof SAGP is slightly lower than that of SAGD,the final residual oil in the steam chamber of SAGD isless than SAGE but the cumulative oil-steam rate(OSR)of SAGP is larger than SAGD.namely,theeconomic effect of SAGP technology is better;(3)in the SAGP technology,when the proportion ofmcondensable gas is 20%,and other technology parameters are the same,the heat lost of SAGP is 79%of SAGD,OSR of SAGP is 0.03 higher than SAGD;(4)SAGP will be a more economical andprospected technology on heavy oil recovery.
机译:采用数值模拟方法研究了蒸汽和不凝性气体辅助重力推动(SAGP)在重油上的过程,获得了过程参数,如温度和饱和度分布等,并对模拟结果进行了分析和比较。在相同条件下的重力排水(SAGD),得出以下结论:(1)在蒸汽室向上扩散过程中,SAGD的垂直扩展速度比SAGp快,但水平扩展速度慢;(2)这两种技术,SAGP的累计油量略低于SAGD,SAGD的蒸汽室中的最终残油小于SAGE,但SAGP的累计油汽率(OSR)大于SAGD。即,经济效果(3)在SAGP技术中,当可凝性气体比例为20%,且其他技术参数相同时,SAGP的热损失为SAGD的79%,SAGP的OSR为0。03更高比SAGD;(4)SAG在重油采收方面,磷将是一种更为经济和理想的技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号