首页> 外文会议>2007 SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference >Field Trial Design and Analyses of Production Data From a Tight Gas Reservoir: Detailed Production Comparisons From the Pinedale Anticline
【24h】

Field Trial Design and Analyses of Production Data From a Tight Gas Reservoir: Detailed Production Comparisons From the Pinedale Anticline

机译:致密气藏的现场试验设计和生产数据分析:Pinedale背斜的详细生产比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Field trials of new methodologies, products or technologies are considered to be an effective way to gauge the true value of such innovations. However it is difficult and expensive to conduct a rigorous field trial, especially in tight, multi-layered reservoirs, and proper design and analyses are critical to accurately interpret the results. In multi-layered reservoirs the production from individual frac stages must often be evaluated with production logs - this additional expense accentuates the need to carefully design the field trial and thoroughly analyze the resulting data to extract as much value as possible. This paper will provide a detailed comparison of well productivity in the Pinedale Anticline as a function of proppant type and subinterval. Well production has been normalized by many parameters, including reservoir kh, kh△P, kh*(Pr 2-Pf2), Φh,and also compared by well location to determine the degree to which those techniques provide similar conclusions. In addition to describing how these field results influence proppant selection in the Pinedale Anticline, this paper will describe many aspects of field trial planning, as well as the proper handling of data to assist in the design of future trials. This paper will review the following topics: ? Design of the field trial ? Efforts to minimize variables ? Well selection to promote valid offset comparisons ? Data handling techniques to minimize bias ? Production logging of wells – calibration and timing ? Detailed comparison of production data, normalized with six methods to determine whether consistent conclusions can be reached ? Statistical analyses to determine whether statistically significant conclusions can be drawn with a high degree of confidence The results of this study will also be compared to other published field trials to examine well populations, data consistency, and to assess whether studies in similar reservoirs carry similar findings. This paper will summarize the conclusions that are consistent between numerous tight gas field studies in the region, and highlight changes to fracture treatments which have consistently improved well productivity and profitability in these reservoirs.
机译:新方法,产品或技术的现场试验被认为是评估此类创新真正价值的有效方法。但是,进行严格的现场试验是困难且昂贵的,尤其是在紧密的多层油藏中,正确的设计和分析对于准确地解释结果至关重要。在多层油藏中,通常必须使用生产测井评估各个压裂阶段的产量-这笔额外费用强调了仔细设计现场试验并彻底分析所得数据以获取尽可能多价值的需求。本文将详细比较Pinedale背斜油井产能与支撑剂类型和子间隔的关系。井产量已通过许多参数进行了归一化,包括储层kh,kh△P,kh *(Pr 2-Pf2),Φh,并通过井位比较来确定这些技术提供相似结论的程度。除了描述这些田间结果如何影响Pinedale背斜中的支撑剂选择外,本文还将描述田间试验计划的许多方面,以及对数据的正确处理以协助将来的试验设计。本文将回顾以下主题:设计现场试用?努力减少变量?选择井以促进有效的偏移量比较?数据处理技术可最大程度减少偏差?井的生产测井–校准和时间安排?对生产数据进行详细比较,并用六种方法进行归一化,以确定是否可以得出一致的结论?统计分析,以确定是否可以高度可信地得出具有统计意义的结论。本研究的结果还将与其他已发表的现场试验进行比较,以检查油井数量,数据一致性,并评估在类似油藏中的研究是否具有相似的发现。本文将总结该地区众多致密气田研究之间的一致结论,并着重介绍裂缝处理方法的变化,这些方法已不断提高了这些油藏的产能和盈利能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号