首页> 外文会议>2005 Offshore technology conference (OTC'05) >Using Wet Shale and Effective Porosity in a Petrophysical Velocity Model
【24h】

Using Wet Shale and Effective Porosity in a Petrophysical Velocity Model

机译:在岩石物理速度模型中使用湿页岩和有效孔隙率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

It is well known that sonic logs can be improved by using arnpetrophysical model to create a theoretical compressional andrnshear sonic. The measured sonic logs are only used as arnguide. There are numerous techniques for doing this, althoughrnthe most popular are the Xu, White and Keys model (Keys andrnXu, Geophysics, 2002) and the Greenberg and Castangnarnmethod (Greenberg and Castangna, Geophysical Prospecting,rn1992).rnThese methods and most others require that the subject well bernanalyzed accurately for porosity, water saturation, and majorrnlithologic and/or mineral components. Using thernpetrophysical analysis the compressional and shear moduli arernbuilt up step by step. First the moduli of the rock mixture arerncomputed, then porosity is added to the mixture and finally thernfluids are added using the Gassmann equation (Gassmann, F.,rnVierteljahrschrift der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft, 1951).rnThe last step is to use the final Gassmann bulk and shearrnmoduli to compute the compressional sonic log and the shearrnmodulus to compute the shear sonic log. Sonic logsrncontaining any fluid mixture can then be computed once thisrnrock framework is built (Batzle and Wang, Geophysics, 1992).rnPast experience has shown us that measured sonic logs arernsubject to serious error due to borehole conditions andrninvasion. When the results of a petrophysical velocity modelrnare used to compare wells to seismic or to build a rockrnstrength model for pore pressure prediction or a wellrncompletion, the results are usually better than with thernmeasured data alone.rnThe best procedures for building these valuable models havernyet to be agreed upon by the industry because the technologyrnis still new. One of the debates is about how to add porosityrnand what porosity to use. Many petrophysicists prefer to userntotal porosity and dry clay volume to build their model.rnOthers, like this author, prefer to use effective porosity andrnwet shale volume. The reasons behind this choice arernpresented.
机译:众所周知,声波测井可以通过使用岩石物理模型来创建理论上的压缩和剪切剪切声波来进行改进。测得的声波测井仅用作指南。有许多方法可以做到这一点,尽管最受欢迎的是Xu,White和Keys模型(Keys andrnXu,Geophysics,2002)以及Greenberg和Castangnarnmethod(Greenberg和Castangna,Geophysical Prospecting,rn1992)。这些方法以及大多数其他方法都要求对该对象的孔隙度,水饱和度以及主要岩性和/或矿物成分进行了准确的分析。利用岩石物理分析逐步建立了压缩模量和剪切模量。首先对岩石混合物的模量进行计算,然后将孔隙度添加到混合物中,最后使用Gassmann方程(Gassmann,F.,Nierforschenden Gesellschaft,1951)来添加流体。最后一步是使用最终的Gassmann体积和剪切模量计算压缩声波测井曲线,剪切模量计算剪切声波测井曲线。一旦建立了该岩石框架,就可以计算出包含任何流体混合物的声波测井曲线(Batzle and Wang,Geophysics,1992)。过去的经验表明,测得的声波测井曲线由于井眼条件和侵入而受到严重误差。当使用岩石物理速度模型的结果将井与地震进行比较或建立岩石强度模型以进行孔隙压力预测或完井时,结果通常比仅使用测得的数据要好。建立这些有价值的模型的最佳方法是业界同意,因为技术还很新。辩论之一是关于如何增加孔隙度以及使用何种孔隙度。许多岩石物理学家更喜欢使用总孔隙度和干粘土体积来建立模型。其他人(例如作者)更喜欢使用有效孔隙度和湿页岩体积。提出了这种选择的原因。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 会议地点 Houston TX(US);Houston TX(US)
  • 作者

    A. May;

  • 作者单位

    Kerr-McGee Oil Gas;

  • 会议组织
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-26 14:12:09

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号