首页> 外文会议>The 2003 International Solar Energy Conference Mar 15-18, 2003 Kohala Coast, Hawall >AN ECONOMIC ANALYSIS METHOD OF ENERGY SAVING STRATEGIES IN NEWLY CONSTRUCTED BUILDINGS
【24h】

AN ECONOMIC ANALYSIS METHOD OF ENERGY SAVING STRATEGIES IN NEWLY CONSTRUCTED BUILDINGS

机译:新建建筑节能策略的经济分析方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Businesses and institutions in the United States spend an estimated $175 billion per year for energy. Of that, the fraction under performance contracts and energy service agreements is currently growing, aided by cheaper monitoring technology and integration with energy management and conservation systems. To estimate the potential savings as well as to help verify energy savings retrofits, the American Society of Heating, Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Engineers has developed Standard 90.1 to provide guidance when conducting energy simulations of buildings before they are constructed. Although the potential accuracy afforded by today's energy simulation programs is high, there is little agreement on current methods when developing the base case building. In addition, there are no current standards to guide the analysis of newly constructed, energy efficient buildings. This paper presents an energy simulation of a newly constructed state office building and compares the energy savings a past study the uses ASHRAE Standard 90.1 and a simulation regression method. Overall, while the results show significant differences between the ASHRAE Standard 90.1 and the calibrated simulation regression method.
机译:据估计,美国的企业和机构每年在能源上的支出为1750亿美元。其中,在廉价的监测技术以及与能源管理和节能系统集成的帮助下,绩效合同和能源服务协议下的比例目前正在增长。为了估算潜在的节省量并帮助验证节能改造,美国供热,制冷和空调工程师协会制定了标准90.1,为在建筑物进行能源模拟之前提供指导。尽管当今的能源模拟程序提供的潜在准确性很高,但是在开发基础案例构建时,目前的方法几乎没有共识。此外,目前没有标准来指导对新建节能建筑的分析。本文介绍了新建的国家办公大楼的能源模拟,并比较了过去使用ASHRAE Standard 90.1和模拟回归方法进行的节能研究。总体而言,虽然结果显示了ASHRAE标准90.1与校准的模拟回归方法之间存在显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号