首页> 外文会议>2003 Information Resources Management Association International Conference Vol.1; May 18-21, 2003; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA >An Analysis of Tools for an Automatic Extraction of Concept in Documents for a Better Knowledge Management
【24h】

An Analysis of Tools for an Automatic Extraction of Concept in Documents for a Better Knowledge Management

机译:自动提取文档中的概念以进行更好的知识管理的工具分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In our project about the digital library (DL) of scientific theses, we need to allow the user an access to the most pertinent information. Therefore, it is important to extract the main concepts to improve the information retrieval in this area. This article represents an empirical evaluation of four tools for automatically extracting concepts from documents. We have compared these tools by using different document collections. For each document, we have extracted manually n list of concepts tied to the main topics. The tools are evaluated according to the degree of similitude between the concepts defined manually and the concepts automatically extracted by these tools. The four evaluated tools arc:(1) TerminologyExtractor of Chamblon Systems Inc., (2) Xerox Terminology Suite of Xerox, (3) Nomino of Nomino Technologies, (4) Copernic Summarizer of NRC. This article presents the criteria of evaluation, a comparative study of the tools, an evaluation of the results and a proposed tool to annotate documents based on the concepts extracted.
机译:在关于科学论文的数字图书馆(DL)的项目中,我们需要允许用户访问最相关的信息。因此,重要的是要提取主要概念以改善该领域的信息检索。本文代表对四种用于自动从文档中提取概念的工具的经验评估。我们通过使用不同的文档集合对这些工具进行了比较。对于每个文档,我们手动提取了与主要主题相关的n个概念列表。根据手动定义的概念与这些工具自动提取的概念之间的相似度,对工具进行评估。评估的四个工具包括:(1)Chamblon Systems Inc.的术语提取器,(2)Xerox的Xerox术语套件,(3)Nomino Technologies的Nomino,(4)NRC的哥白尼总结器。本文介绍了评估的标准,工具的比较研究,结果的评估以及根据提取的概念对文档进行注释的拟议工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号