首页> 外文会议>2001 conference of Waste Management (WM);Annual Waste Management Symposium >DEVELOPMENT OF A LONG-TERM DISPOSITION OPTION FOREXCESS RADIOACTIVE SEALED SOURCES
【24h】

DEVELOPMENT OF A LONG-TERM DISPOSITION OPTION FOREXCESS RADIOACTIVE SEALED SOURCES

机译:放射性超密封源的长期处置选择的发展

获取原文

摘要

In medicine, medical research, and numerous other fields, the use of sealed radioactivesources has greatly improved human living conditions. However, many of these sealedsources become obsolete, or excess. If improperly managed, these once beneficialsources can cause serious injury, or death. In the U.S., the most problematic of thesesealed sources are those held by state and Federal licensees for several years with nooption for disposal. As radioactive waste, this backlog of sealed sources would beclassified as Greater-than-Class-C (GTCC) low-level waste by the U.S. NuclearRegulatory Commission (NRC).Recognizing these hazards, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has implemented theOff-Site Source Recovery (OSR) Project to (a) recover, (b) store, and (c) dispose of theGTCC LLW sealed sources and other similar materials as designated by the DOE. Thenear-term objective of the DOE’s OSR Project is to reduce the risk to the general publicand the environment from excess and unwanted sealed sources that are not now underDOE control. This paper emphasizes the OSR Project’s (a) near-term activities that willestablish a technical basis for developing disposal options, (b) the activities necessary toselect a disposal option, or options through the National Environmental Policy Act(NEPA) process and, (c) provides a summary of current activities. As this mortgage ofsealed sources in storage at DOE sites builds, the need to implement a viable disposaloption becomes more acute.The Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1985 dictates that (a) thefederal government, and specifically DOE, is responsible for disposal of GTCC LLW,and (b) the GTCC LLW disposal facility must be licensed by the NRC.GTCC LLW is not generally suitable for near-surface disposal, and disposal in a geologicrepository is the NRC’s default option for GTCC LLW disposal, although the NRC willconsider alternative disposal methods that the DOE might propose. As a generalization,in a storage or disposal facility, the GTCC LLW actinides could pose a health threat forthousands of years, and the GTCC LLW non-actinides will pose a health threat for a fewhundred years. This general division of the GTCC LLW may lead the OSR Project todevelop two separate disposal options.Because the NRC has never licensed a GTCC LLW disposal site, the NRC will have todevelop the licensing process and the review criteria for the license application. Inaddition to the NRC’s licensing standards, a GTCC LLW disposal facility may also haveto meet EPA disposal standards. One regulatory outlier is the co-disposal of GTCC LLWin the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP), which is an EPA certified geologic repositoryfor defense transuranic (TRU) wastes. Many of the GTCC LLWs from NRC licenseesare identical in character to defense TRU wastes that have been approved for disposal inWIPP. The OSR Project will explore the option of disposal in WIPP of those GTCCLLWs that are similar in character to the TRU wastes destine for WIPP.An options analysis will be performed to define the disposal option(s) that will beimplemented. The analysis can be divided into three stages: (1) define the criteria thatwill be used to screen the options and a strategy for implementing the analysis; (2) gatherinformation on each option; and (3) implement a broad screening analysis. The screeninganalysis will be implemented by the DOE through the NEPA process. This work willlead to the development of a viable GTCC LLW disposal option for sealed sources by2006.
机译:在医学,医学研究和许多其他领域中,密封放射源的使用大大改善了人类的生活条件。但是,这些密封源中有许多已过时或过多。如果管理不当,这些曾经有用的资源可能会导致严重的伤害或死亡。在美国,这些密封源中最成问题的是那些由州和联邦许可持有者持有数年且无选择处置的源。作为放射性废物,这种积压的密封源将被美国核监管委员会(NRC)归类为C类(GTCC)以上低级废物。美国能源部(DOE)认识到这些危害后,实施了Off -站点资源回收(OSR)项目,用于(a)回收,(b)储存和(c)处置GTCC LLW密封源和DOE指定的其他类似材料。美国能源部OSR项目的近期目标是降低目前不受DOE控制的过多和不需要的密封源对公众和环境的风险。本文强调OSR项目的(a)近期活动,这些活动将为制定处置方案奠定技术基础;(b)选择处置方案所必需的活动,或通过《国家环境政策法》(NEPA)程序进行的方案;以及(c )提供了当前活动的摘要。随着在DOE站点中存储的密封源抵押的建立,实施可行的处置方法的需求变得更加迫切。1985年的《低放射性废物政策修正法》规定:(a)联邦政府,特别是DOE,负责处置(b)GTCC LLW处置设施必须获得NRC的许可。GTCCLLW通常不适合近地表处置,并且在地质处置库中进行处置是NRC的GTCC LLW处置的默认选项,尽管NRC将考虑能源部可能提出的替代处置方法。概括地说,在储存或处置设施中,GTCC LLW act系元素可能对健康造成数千年的威胁,而GTCC LLW的非-系元素将对健康造成数百年的威胁。 GTCC LLW的这一总体划分可能会导致OSR项目开发两个单独的处置方案。由于NRC从未对GTCC LLW处置场所进行许可,因此NRC必须制定许可程序和许可申请的审查标准。除了NRC的许可标准外,GTCC LLW处置设施还可能必须符合EPA处置标准。一个监管异常是GTCC LLWin废物隔离中试厂(WIPP)的共同处置,该厂是EPA认证的国防用超铀(TRU)废物地质处置库。 NRC许可证持有者的许多GTCC LLW的特性与已批准在WIPP中处置的国防TRU废物相同。 OSR项目将探索那些与WIPP所需的TRU废物性质相似的GTCCLLW在WIPP中处置的选择,并将进行方案分析以定义将要实施的处置方案。分析可分为三个阶段:(1)定义将用于筛选选项的标准和实施分析的策略; (2)收集每个选项的信息; (3)进行广泛的筛选分析。筛选分析将由美国能源部通过NEPA流程进行。这项工作将导致到2006年为密封源开发可行的GTCC LLW处置方案。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 会议地点 Tucson, AZ(US);Tucson, AZ(US)
  • 作者

  • 作者单位

    Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque NM 87185;

    Los Alamos National LaboratoryLos Alamos NM 87544;

    U.S. Department of EnergyAlbuquerque NM;

    U.S. Department of EnergyWashington DC;

    Millard Technical ConsultantsPlacitas NM 87043;

  • 会议组织
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号