首页> 外文会议>20 years of Progress in Radar Altimetry >INVESTIGATING AND REDUCING THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE SATELLITE ALTIMETRY-BASED GLOBAL MEAN SEA LEVEL TIME SERIES PROVIDED BY THE DIFFERENT PROCESSING GROUPS
【24h】

INVESTIGATING AND REDUCING THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE SATELLITE ALTIMETRY-BASED GLOBAL MEAN SEA LEVEL TIME SERIES PROVIDED BY THE DIFFERENT PROCESSING GROUPS

机译:调查和减少不同处理组提供的基于卫星测高的全球平均海平面时间序列之间的差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Satellite altimetry-based global mean sea level (GMSL)rntime series provided by the different processing groupsrnagree well in terms of trend over the whole altimetry erarn(1993-2010) but show significant differences atrninterannual time scale. In a recent paper, Masters et alrn(2012) investigated the effect of the different geophysicalrncorrections and processing methodology adopted by therndifferent groups, and found that the method of datarnaveraging and minimum depth criteria seemed to be thernmain causes of the observed discrepancies.rnHere we go one step further and attempt to discriminaternthe best approach for averaging the satellite data tornproduct the GMSL time series. We also address the effectrnof considering or not the shelf areas. For that purpose, wernuse the versions GLORYS2V1of the high-resolutionrnMERCATOR ocean circulation model, with datarnassimilation (temporal and spatial resolutions of 1-dayrnand 0.25°). We produce a set of synthetic sea surfacernheight (SSH) data by interpolating the model data at therntime and location of the 'true' along-track satelliternaltimetry measurements. We focus on the Jason-1rnoperating period (i.e., 2002-2009). These synthetic SSHrndata are then treated as “true” altimetric measurements.rnWith this synthetic data set, we test the differentrnaveraging methods classically used by the processingrngroups: along-track averaging, simple gridding (on 1°×1°,rn2°×2° or 3°×3° grids) and more sophisticated griddingrnprocedures. We also test the effect of considering or notrnshallow depths (<120 m). Finally we discuss the effect ofrnthe wet troposphere correction replacement in JASON-1rndata.
机译:不同处理组提供的基于卫星测高的全球平均海平面(GMSL)时间序列在整个测高erarn(1993-2010)的趋势上都很好地吻合,但在年际时间尺度上显示出显着差异。在最近的一篇论文中,Masters等人(2012)研究了不同群体采用的不同地球物理校正和处理方法的影响,发现数据平均和最小深度标准的方法似乎是观察到差异的主要原因。进一步迈出了第一步,尝试区分出将GMSL时间序列乘以卫星数据的最佳方法。我们还考虑了是否考虑货架区域的影响。为此,我们将高分辨率rnMERCATOR海洋环流模型的GLORYS2V1版本与数据同化(1天和0.25°的时空分辨率)一起使用。我们通过在“真实”沿线卫星测高仪测量的时间和位置插值模型数据来生成一组合成海面高度(SSH)数据。我们将重点放在Jason-1操纵时期(即2002-2009年)。然后,将这些合成的SSHrndata视为“真实”高度测量。rn使用此合成数据集,我们测试了处理组经典使用的不同平均方法:沿轨迹平均,简单网格划分(在1°×1°,rn2°×2°或3°×3°栅格)和更复杂的栅格化程序。我们还测试了考虑浅浅深度(小于120 m)的效果。最后,我们讨论了在JASON-1rndata中对流对流层校正的效果。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 会议地点 Venice(IT)
  • 作者单位

    LEGOS, 14 avenue Edouard Belin, 31400 Toulouse, France olivier.henry@legos.obs-mip.fr;

    LEGOS, 14 avenue Edouard Belin, 31400 Toulouse, France benoit.meyssignac@legos.obs-mip.fr;

    (2) CLS, 8-10 rue Hermès, Parc Technologique du Canal, 31520 Ramonville Saint-Agne, France mablain@cls.fr;

    LEGOS, 14 avenue Edouard Belin, 31400 Toulouse, France anny.cazenave@legos.obs-mip.fr;

    CCAR, Colorado University, USA dallas.masters@colorado.edu;

    CCAR, Colorado University, USA nerem@colorado.edu;

    Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research and Wealth from Oceans Flagship, CSIROMarine and Atmospheric Research, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia;

    Mercator-Ocean, 8-10 rue Hermès, Parc Technologique du Canal, 31520 Ramonville Saint-Agne, France gilles.garric@mercator-ocean.fr;

  • 会议组织
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号