首页> 外文会议>1999 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Industry: Industry amp; Innovation in the 21st Century, 1999, 1999 >Voluntary Agreements in Industry: A Comparative Description of the Process and a Normative Analysis
【24h】

Voluntary Agreements in Industry: A Comparative Description of the Process and a Normative Analysis

机译:行业自愿协议:过程的比较描述和规范分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this paper we analyse voluntary agreements used as policy instruments to increase energy efficiency in industrial production processes. The analysis is based on case studies of voluntary agreements in Great Britain, Denmark, Finland, The Netherlands and Sweden. The viewpoint in our approach will be the policy process starting with the political choice of the use of voluntary agreements as apolitical instrument ending with the effects at company level. The agreements are negotiated between representatives from the industry and the authorities. The targets are the main issues during the negotiations. Methods for monitoring and sanctions have only been minor issues in the negotiations. The choice of voluntary agreements follows a tradition in industrial policy of using voluntary approaches or softer measures in general. The design of the voluntary agreements differs substantially in scope and design. Concerning the normative assessment, we use seven criteria based on suggestions put forward by the European Commission and the International Energy Agency among others. Looking at the agreement through these glasses, they do not look very good. The Dutch and the Danish agreements come out as the winners. But other glasses could be used. Voluntary agreements could also be considered as an early instrument in a new policy area in situations where a more coercive regulation with taxes or prohibitions is impossible.
机译:在本文中,我们分析了自愿协议,这些协议被用作提高工业生产过程中能源效率的政策工具。该分析基于英国,丹麦,芬兰,荷兰和瑞典的自愿协议案例研究。在我们的方法中,观点将是政策过程,首先是从政治上选择使用自愿协议作为非政治手段,最后是对公司层面的影响。该协议是由行业代表与主管部门协商达成的。目标是谈判期间的主要问题。监督和制裁方法只是谈判中的次要问题。自愿协议的选择遵循工业政策的传统,即通常采用自愿方法或较宽松的措施。自愿协议的设计在范围和设计上有很大不同。关于规范性评估,我们根据欧盟委员会和国际能源机构等提出的建议使用了七个标准。通过这些眼镜看协议,它们看起来不是很好。荷兰和丹麦的协议是赢家。但是也可以使用其他眼镜。在不可能对税收或禁令进行更强制性监管的情况下,自愿协议也可被视为新政策领域的早期手段。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号