首页> 外文会议>17th World Congress on Ergonomics(第十七届国际人类工效学大会)论文集 >Reducing the risk of Hand-Arm Vibration Syndrome (HAVS): a systematic review of interventions
【24h】

Reducing the risk of Hand-Arm Vibration Syndrome (HAVS): a systematic review of interventions

机译:降低手部振动综合征(HAVS)的风险:干预措施的系统回顾

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A systematic literature review of 15 electronic databases was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of interventions strategies for the prevention and management of HAVS. Only those intervention studies that adopted clearly defined health outcome measures and well defined intervention approaches were included in the review. The quality of each study was critically appraised and graded using a modified version of the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Injuries Group (CMIG) scoring system. A total of 11 intervention studies were considered to meet the inclusion criteria of this review. One study was considered to involve a mechanical intervention (i.e. the introduction of anti-vibration tools and gloves), while three studies incorporated combined mechanical and production system interventions (e.g. modified tool design and time management or protective measures). Seven modifier intervention studies focused primarily on the effects of drug treatment. The multi-dimensional approaches incorporated by many of the studies made it impossible to isolate the efficiency of the individual components of an intervention approach for reducing the incidence of HAVS. Whilst most drug therapy interventions showed improved symptoms of HAVS, these studies often involved relatively short periods of drug administration, lacked long term follow-up and sometimes resulted in notable side effects. The poor quality of studies stemmed primarily from the inherent difficulties of introducing interventions into occupational settings that were continually changing. Prevention and early intervention appears to offer most benefits in reducing the risk of developing HAVS, or affecting recovery from symptoms.
机译:对15个电子数据库进行了系统的文献综述,以评估预防和管理HAVS的干预策略的有效性。该评价仅包括那些采用明确定义的健康结局指标和明确定义的干预方法的干预研究。使用改良版的Cochrane肌肉骨骼损伤组(CMIG)评分系统对每个研究的质量进行严格评估和分级。共有11项干预研究被认为符合该评价的纳入标准。一项研究被认为涉及机械干预(即引入防振工具和手套),而三项研究则结合了机械和生产系统干预措施(例如改进的工具设计和时间管理或保护措施)。七项修饰剂干预研究主要集中于药物治疗的效果。许多研究纳入的多维方法使得无法隔离降低HAVS发生率的干预方法各个组成部分的效率。尽管大多数药物治疗干预措施均显示出HAVS症状改善,但这些研究通常涉及相对较短的药物给药时间,缺乏长期随访,有时会导致明显的副作用。研究质量差主要是由于将干预措施引入不断变化的职业环境中所固有的困难。预防和早期干预似乎在降低发展HAVS的风险或影响症状恢复方面提供最大的益处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号