首页> 外文会议>12th annual conference of the CFD Society of Canada (CFD 2004) >Verification of Supersonic and Hypersonic Semi-Empirical Predictions using CFD
【24h】

Verification of Supersonic and Hypersonic Semi-Empirical Predictions using CFD

机译:使用CFD验证超音速和高音速半经验预测

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

CFD was used to verify the accuracy of the axial force,normal force,and pitching moment predictions of two semi-empirical codes.This analysis consid- ered the flow around the forebody of four different aerodynamic shapes.These included geometries with equal-volume straight or tapered bodies,with either standard or double-angle nose cones.The flow was tested at freestream Mach numbers of M=1.5,4.0, and 7.0.The CFD results gave the expected flow pres- sure contours for each geometry.The geometries with straight bodies produced larger axial forces,smaller normal forces,and larger pitching moments compared to the geometries with tapered bodies.The double- angle nose cones introduced a shock into the flow,but affected the straight-body geometries more than the tapered-body geometries.Both semi-empirical codes predicted axial forces that were consistent with the CFD data.The agreement between the normal forces and pitching moments was not as good,particularly for the straight-body geometries.But even though the semi-empirical results were not exactly the same as the CFD data,the semi-empirical codes provided rough estimates of the aerodynamic parameters in a fraction of the time required to perform a CFD analysis.
机译:CFD用于验证两个半经验代码的轴向力,法向力和俯仰力矩预测的准确性。该分析考虑了四种不同空气动力学形状的前体周围的流动。这些包括具有等体积笔直的几何形状在自由流马赫数分别为M = 1.5、4.0和7.0的情况下测试了流动。CFD结果给出了每种几何形状的预期流动压力轮廓。与带有锥形体的几何体相比,直形体产生更大的轴向力,更小的法向力和更大的俯仰力矩。双锥角锥形锥向流中引入了冲击,但比锥形体的几何体对直形体的影响更大两个半经验代码都预测了与CFD数据一致的轴向力。法向力和俯仰力矩之间的一致性不好,特别是对于直体几何形状但是,即使半经验结果与CFD数据不完全相同,半经验代码也可以在执行CFD分析所需的一小部分时间内提供空气动力学参数的粗略估计。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号