【24h】

Alternative approaches to risk evaluation

机译:风险评估的替代方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Different approaches to risk analysis with a focus on risk estimation and risk evaluation have been compared. Critical aspects of quantitative and qualitative methods and criteria are summarised. An explosives accident has been analysed as an example. The explosion occurred in a system, which was frequently changed and exposed to disturbances. This entailed a number of difficulties in the validity of the results of the performed risk analysis. For example, the actual type of accident was not anticipated. Systems, where changes are frequently introduced as a result of disturbances in the process, offer a number of difficulties in making a risk analysis. Risk assessments, especially those based on probabilistic approaches, could easily be of reduced value, due to a number of reasons. For this type of situations, alternatives to traditional probabilistic assessments could offer advantages. There are a number of qualitative approaches that are interesting to explore further, and a test with Safety Function Analysis appeared to solve some of the problems related to system changes.
机译:比较了以风险评估和风险评估为重点的不同风险分析方法。总结了定量和定性方法与标准的关键方面。以爆炸事故为例进行了分析。爆炸发生在一个系统中,该系统经常更换并且容易受到干扰。这在进行的风险分析的结果的有效性方面带来了许多困难。例如,没有预料到实际的事故类型。由于过程中的干扰而经常引入更改的系统为进行风险分析提供了许多困难。由于多种原因,风险评估(尤其是基于概率方法的评估)的价值可能会轻易降低。对于此类情况,传统概率评估的替代方法可能会带来优势。有许多有趣的定性方法需要进一步探索,并且出现了带有安全功能分析的测试来解决与系统更改相关的一些问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号