...
首页> 外文期刊>Medical care >Do Medicaid and Commercial CAHPS Scores Correlate Within Plans?: A New Jersey Case Study.
【24h】

Do Medicaid and Commercial CAHPS Scores Correlate Within Plans?: A New Jersey Case Study.

机译:医疗补助和商业CAHPS评分在计划内是否相关?:新泽西州的案例研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND:: The Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS) health plan survey is currently administered to large independent samples of Medicaid beneficiaries and commercial enrollees for managed care organizations that serve both populations. There is interest in reducing survey administration costs and sample size requirements by sampling these 2 groups together for health plan comparisons. Plan managers may also be interested in understanding variability within plans. OBJECTIVE:: The objective of this study was to assess whether the within plan correlation of CAHPS scores for the 2 populations are sufficiently large to warrant inferences about one from the other, reducing the total sample sizes needed. RESEARCH DESIGN:: This study consisted of an observational cross-sectional study. SUBJECTS:: Subjects were 3939 Medicaid beneficiaries and 3027 commercial enrollees in 6 New Jersey managed care plans serving both populations. MEASURES:: Outcomes are 4 global ratings and 6 report composites from the CAHPS 1.0 survey. RESULTS:: Medicaid beneficiaries reported poorer care than commercial beneficiaries for 6 composites, but none of the 4 global ratings. Controlling for these main effects, variability between commercial enrollees and Medicaid beneficiaries within plans exceeded variability by plans for commercial enrollees for 4 of the 10 measures (2 composites, 2 global ratings). CONCLUSIONS:: Within-plan variability in evaluations of care by Medicaid and commercial health plan member evaluations is too great to permit meaningful inference about plan performance for one population from the other for many important outcomes; separate surveys should still be fielded.
机译:背景:消费者健康计划研究评估(CAHPS)健康计划调查目前针对服务于这两个人群的管理式医疗组织的大型独立医疗补助受益人和商业参与者进行。有兴趣通过将这两个组一起采样以进行健康计划比较来降低调查管理成本和样本量要求。计划经理也可能对理解计划中的可变性感兴趣。目的:本研究的目的是评估两个人群的CAHPS评分在计划内的相关性是否足够大,以至于可以推论彼此之间的推断,从而减少了所需的总样本量。研究设计:该研究包括一项观察性横断面研究。受试者:在6个新泽西州管理的护理计划中,有3939名Medicaid受益人和3027名商业参保人服务于这两个人群。指标:结果来自CAHPS 1.0调查的4个全球评级和6个报告综合。结果::医疗补助受益人报告的6种复合材料的保健服务较商业受益人差,但4种全球评级中没有一种。为了控制这些主要影响,计划中的商业参与者和医疗补助受益人之间的差异超出了商业参与者计划的10种措施中的4种的可变性(2个综合指标,2个全球评级)。结论:医疗补助计划和商业健康计划成员对计划的评估中计划内的差异太大,以至于无法从一个人群对另一个人群的许多重要结果进行有意义的推断。仍应进行单独的调查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号