...
首页> 外文期刊>Gait & posture >Evaluation of instrumented shoes for ambulatory assessment of ground reaction forces.
【24h】

Evaluation of instrumented shoes for ambulatory assessment of ground reaction forces.

机译:用于步行评估地面反作用力的仪表鞋的评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Currently, force plates or pressure sensitive insoles are the standard tools to measure ground reaction forces and centre of pressure data during human gait. Force plates, however, impose constraints on foot placement, and the available pressure sensitive insoles measure only one component of force. In this study, shoes instrumented with two force transducers measuring forces and moments in three dimensions were evaluated. Technical performance was assessed by comparing force measurement and centre of pressure reconstructions of the instrumented shoes against a force plate. The effect of the instrumented shoes on gait was investigated using an optical tracking system and a force plate. Instrumented shoes were compared against normal shoes and weighted shoes. The ground reaction force measured with force plate and instrumented shoes differed by 2.2+/-0.1% in magnitude and by 3.4+/-1.3 degrees in direction. The horizontal components differed by 9.9+/-3.8% in magnitude and 26.9+/-10.0 degrees in direction. Centre of pressure location differed by 13.7+/-2.4mm between measurement systems. A MANOVA repeated measures analysis on data of seven subjects, revealed significant differences in gait pattern between shoe types (p
机译:当前,测力板或压敏鞋垫是在人的步态中测量地面反作用力和压力中心数据的标准工具。然而,测力板对脚的放置施加了限制,并且可用的压敏鞋垫仅测量力的一个分量。在这项研究中,评估了配备有两个力传感器的鞋子,这些力传感器可在三个维度上测量力和力矩。通过比较测力仪和仪表板与测力板的压力重建中心来评估技术性能。使用光学跟踪系统和测力板研究了器械鞋对步态的影响。将工具鞋与普通鞋和加重鞋进行了比较。用测力板和仪表靴测得的地面反作用力在大小上相差2.2 +/- 0.1%,在方向上相差3.4 +/- 1.3度。水平分量的幅度相差9.9 +/- 3.8%,方向相差26.9 +/- 10.0度。测量系统之间的压力中心位置相差13.7 +/- 2.4mm。 MANOVA对7位受试者的数据进行的重复测量分析显示,不同鞋子类型之间的步态差异显着(p

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号