...
首页> 外文期刊>Gait & posture >Assessment of the effects of carbon fiber and bionic foot during overground and treadmill walking in transtibial amputees
【24h】

Assessment of the effects of carbon fiber and bionic foot during overground and treadmill walking in transtibial amputees

机译:评估跨界截肢者在地面和跑步机上行走时碳纤维和仿生脚的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To determine the energy cost of walking (ECW) of a bionic foot (Proprio-Foot?) during ambulation on floor and on treadmill (at different slopes) compared to walking with a dynamic carbon fiber foot (DCF). We evaluated transtibial amputees (TTAs) perceived mobility with the prosthesis and their walking ability on stairs and ramps. Method: TTAs were enrolled. The ECW tests were conducted on a regular floor surface and on treadmill with -5%, 0% and 12% slopes. In all conditions, TTAs were asked to walk at their own self-selected speed. Metabolic and cardiac data were collected using a portable gas analyzer. Tests were performed at six data collection points: first with a standard suction system (SSS) and the DCF; second, with the DCF after 7 weeks of using a hypobaric suspension system (HSS) with the DCF; third, after 1h of Proprio-Foot? use together with the HSS; three more testing sessions were carried out at 30-day intervals, i.e., after 30, 60 and 90 days of Proprio-Foot? use together with the HSS. TTAs perceived mobility using the prosthesis and walking ability on stairs and ramps were assessed. Results: Ten TTAs completed the measurements. ECW with the Proprio-Foot? obtained in the final floor-walking test was significantly lower than ECW with the DCF (p=0.002). No significant improvements were observed for perceived mobility or walking ability. Conclusions: Results suggest that use of the Proprio-Foot? can lower the ECW for TTAs in spite of its added weight compared to DCF.
机译:目的:确定与动态碳纤维脚(DCF)行走相比,仿生脚(Proprio-Foot?)在地板和跑步机(在不同坡度)上行走时行走的能量成本(ECW)。我们评估了假肢及其在楼梯和坡道上的行走能力,评估了胫骨截肢者(TTA)的活动能力。方法:招募TTA。 ECW测试是在常规地板和跑步机上进行的,坡度为-5%,0%和12%。在所有情况下,都要求TTA以自己选择的速度行走。使用便携式气体分析仪收集代谢和心脏数据。在六个数据收集点进行了测试:首先是使用标准吸风系统(SSS)和DCF;其次是使用DCF。第二,与DCF一起使用低压悬挂系统(HSS)7周后,再使用DCF;第三,在Proprio-Foot 1小时之后?与HSS一起使用;在30天,60天和90天的Proprio-Foot之后,每隔30天进行另外三个测试会话。与HSS一起使用。使用假体以及在楼梯和斜道上的步行能力评估了TTA的活动能力。结果:十个TTA完成了测量。 ECW与Proprio-Foot?在最终的地板行走测试中获得的结果显着低于采用DCF的ECW(p = 0.002)。知觉活动能力或步行能力未见明显改善。结论:结果提示使用Proprio-Foot?尽管与DCF相比增加了重量,但仍可以降低TTA的ECW。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号