...
首页> 外文期刊>Earth and Planetary Science Letters: A Letter Journal Devoted to the Development in Time of the Earth and Planetary System >Role of the 3-D distributions of load and lithospheric strength in orogenic arcs: polystage subsidence in the Carpathians foredeep
【24h】

Role of the 3-D distributions of load and lithospheric strength in orogenic arcs: polystage subsidence in the Carpathians foredeep

机译:负荷和岩石圈强度的3-D分布在造山弧中的作用:喀尔巴阡山前深层中的多级沉降

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

It has been widely documented that the depth of foredeeps does not always reflect the topography of the neighboring orogens. In many cases, the topographic load is insufficient to explain basin subsidence. Such is the case of the SE Carpathians where an anomalously deep (almost 13 km) foreland basin has evolved since the Middle Miocene (Badenian). A peculiar feature of this basin is its position relative to the orogen. In contrast to typical foredeeps, which deepen towards the belt, the maximum depth of this basin is 10–20 km out of the orogen. The subsidence in the Carpathians Bend foreland is characterized by two stages: the first is Middle Miocene (Badenian) in age and is related to NE–SW extension when fault-bounded basins were formed. Modeling shows that the foreland underwent small pre-orogenic uniform thinning. The modeling also predicts <100 m post-rift subsidence in accordance with the regional unconformity observed at the Middle/Upper Miocene (Badenian/Sarmatian) boundary. The second subsidence stage follows rifting and is caused by flexural loading of the Carpathians nappes. According to the planform flexural modeling results, the location of depocenter in front of the Carpathians Bend in the latter contractional stage can be accounted for by the present topography if lateral variations in lithospheric strength are taken into account. Since the depth of the predicted basin is half of what is actually observed, an extra-load is required, which is equivalent to 500–800 m in terms of extra topography. In this case, the predicted basin corresponds with the observed geometry in terms of position/shape and depth, the latter depending on the magnitude of intraplate stresses as well. The modeling also suggests that the flexural fore-bulge of the Carpathians system is represented by the uplifted Dobrogea. Our explanation for the large subsidence recorded by the SE Carpathians foredeep highlights the control exerted by lateral changes in lithospheric strength on 3-D subsidence patterns in arcuate orogenic belts.
机译:有广泛的文献记载,前倾的深度并不总是反映邻近造山带的地形。在许多情况下,地形负荷不足以解释盆地的沉降。 SE喀尔巴阡山脉就是这种情况,自中新世中期(巴甸)以来,异常深的前陆盆地(近13公里)发生了变化。该盆地的一个独特特征是它相对于造山带的位置。与向地带深处的典型前坡形成对比,该盆地的最大深度是距造山带10-20 km。喀尔巴阡弯前陆的沉降具有两个阶段:第一个阶段是中新世(Badenian)年龄,与断层界定盆地形成时的NE–SW扩张有关。建模表明,前陆经历了小型造山前均匀变薄。该模型还根据中新世(上中新统)/上新世(Badenian / Sarmatian)边界观测到的区域不整合面,预测了<100 m的裂陷后沉降。第二沉陷阶段是裂谷之后,是由喀尔巴阡山脉的尿布的弯曲载荷引起的。根据平面弯曲建模结果,如果考虑岩石圈强度的横向变化,则在后期收缩阶段喀尔巴阡弯前的沉积中心位置可以由当前地形来解释。由于预测盆地的深度是实际观测深度的一半,因此需要额外的荷载,就额外的地形而言,这相当于500–800 m。在这种情况下,预测的盆地在位置/形状和深度方面与观察到的几何形状相对应,后者也取决于板内应力的大小。该模型还表明,喀尔巴阡山脉系统的弯曲前隆起以隆起的多布罗加为代表。我们对喀尔巴阡山脉喀尔巴阡山脉前深层记录的大沉陷的解释强调了岩石圈强度横向变化对弧形造山带3D沉降模式的控制作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号