...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics >Effects of experience and uncertainty during dynamic decision making
【24h】

Effects of experience and uncertainty during dynamic decision making

机译:动态决策过程中经验和不确定性的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The decision response times in a dynamic tactical scenario in which participants interacted with a virtual command-post environment was investigated. Fifty-two Marines with varying amounts of command-post experience assessed the situation as it developed, determined tactical leverage points, formed a plan of action, and submitted battle orders. Two scenarios were studied-each differed in the level of certainty in the information provided. The tactical decision process was modeled and analyzed in the following sequential, cognitive stages: situation assessment, course of action selection, course of action execution. Results show that the time required to assess the situation was significantly longer (p <0.05), for the high-experience group than the low-experience group. However, once the assessment was complete, the selection of a course of action (COA) was significantly faster for the high-experience group than the low-experience group. In addition, COA selection under conditions of low certainty was significantly longer than under conditions of high certainty. Time required for COA execution indicated a significant main effect of experience (p <0.05), a main effect of task certainty approaching statistical significance (p = 0.067), and a statistically significant interaction (p <0.05). These results indicate that the time needed to execute the COA, once determined, is significantly less for the highly experienced individuals under conditions of low certainty. However, under the conditions of high certainty, no statistically significant time differences were found based upon the experience level. The high-experience group was significantly more accurate than the low-experience group for developing an appropriate COA.
机译:研究了参与者与虚拟指挥所环境互动的动态战术场景中的决策响应时间。 52名拥有不同指挥所经验的海军陆战队评估了局势的发展,确定了战术要点,制定了行动计划,并提交了战斗命令。研究了两种方案-每种方案在提供的信息方面的确定性水平不同。在以下连续的认知阶段对战术决策过程进行建模和分析:情境评估,行动选择过程,行动执行过程。结果表明,高经验组比低经验组评估情况所需的时间明显更长(p <0.05)。但是,一旦评估完成,高经验组的行动方针(COA)的选择要比低经验组的行动明显更快。此外,在低确定性条件下的COA选择要比在高确定性条件下的选择长得多。执行COA所需的时间表明经验显着的主要影响(p <0.05),任务确定性的主要影响接近统计显着性(p = 0.067)和统计学上显着的交互作用(p <0.05)。这些结果表明,对于经验丰富的个人,在确定性较低的条件下,一旦确定了执行COA所需的时间,将大大减少。但是,在高度确定的条件下,根据经验水平,没有发现统计学上显着的时间差异。对于开发适当的COA,高经验组比低经验组更准确。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号