...
首页> 外文期刊>Annales de biologie clinique >External quality assessment in clinical biochemistry laboratories: pilot study in 11 laboratories of Lome (Togo)
【24h】

External quality assessment in clinical biochemistry laboratories: pilot study in 11 laboratories of Lome (Togo)

机译:临床生物化学实验室的外部质量评估:洛美的11个实验室(多哥)的试点研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study aims to evaluate the performance of a few biochemistry analysis and make recommendations to the place of the stakeholders. It is a cross-sectional study conducted between the October 1st, 2012 and the July 31, 2013 bearing on the results of 5 common examinations of clinical biochemistry, provided by 11 laboratories volunteers opening in the public and private sectors. These laboratories have analysed during the 3 cycles, 2 levels (medium and high) of serum concentration of urea, glucose, creatinine and serum aminotransferases. The performance of laboratories have been determined from the acceptable limits corresponding to the limits of total errors, defined by the French Society of Clinical Biology (SFBC). A system of internal quality control is implemented by all laboratories and 45% of them participated in international programs of external quality assessment (EQA). The rate of acceptable results for the entire study was of 69%. There was a significant difference (p < 0.002) between the performance of the group of laboratories engaged in a quality approach and the group with default implementation of the quality approach. Also a significant difference was observed between the laboratories of the central level and those of the peripheral level of our health system (p < 0.047). The performance of the results provided by the laboratories remains relatively unsatisfactory. It is important that the Ministry of Health put in place a national program of EQA with mandatory participation.
机译:这项研究旨在评估一些生物化学分析的性能,并向利益相关者提出建议。这是一项横断面研究,于2012年10月1日至2013年7月31日进行,涉及5种临床生物化学常规检查的结果,该检查由11名在公共和私营部门开放的实验室志愿者提供。这些实验室在3个周期中分析了2种水平(中和高)的尿素,葡萄糖,肌酐和血清氨基转移酶的血清浓度。实验室的性能已根据法国临床生物学协会(SFBC)定义的与总误差范围相对应的可接受范围来确定。所有实验室都实施了内部质量控制体系,其中有45%的实验室参加了国际外部质量评估(EQA)计划。整个研究的可接受结果率为69%。从事质量方法的实验室小组与默认实施质量方法的小组的绩效之间存在显着差异(p <0.002)。在我们卫生系统的中央实验室和边缘实验室之间也发现了显着差异(p <0.047)。实验室提供的结果表现仍然相对不令人满意。卫生部必须实施强制参与的EQA国家计划,这一点很重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号