...
首页> 外文期刊>Angewandte Chemie >Controversy in Chemistry:What Counts as Evidence?Two Studies in Molecular Structure
【24h】

Controversy in Chemistry:What Counts as Evidence?Two Studies in Molecular Structure

机译:化学之争:什么才算证据?分子结构的两项研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

"The facts speak for themselves." Well ...in science as in life,sometimes yes but often no.The very process of turning scientific data into "facts" can itself be contentious,so that even at this level the "facts" may be far from universally agreed upon.Even when they are,assessing their larger significance is an interpretive process that frequently leads to disagreement or worse.In brief,the normal practice of science provides ample opportunity for controversy;indeed,it is the rare scientist who has not followed,if not participated in,a vigorous scientific controversy that has stretched out for months or even years.
机译:“事实说明一切。”嗯……在科学中,就像在生活中一样,有时是,但往往不是。将科学数据转化为“事实”的过程本身可能会引起争议,因此即使在这个级别上,“事实”也可能远未得到普遍认同。即使是他们,评估其更大的意义也是一个解释过程,常常会导致分歧甚至更糟。总之,科学的正常实践为争论提供了充足的机会;实际上,如果没有参加,那是罕见的科学家没有遵循一场激烈的科学争论已经持续了几个月甚至几年。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号