...
【24h】

Can sarcoidosis and metastatic bone lesions be reliably differentiated on routine MRI?

机译:常规MRI能否可靠地区分结节病和转移性骨病变?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE. Sarcoidosis lesions revealed on MRI in the axial skeleton and long bones resemble osseous metastases, which can lead to a potentially significant misdiagnosis. We hypothesized that osseous sarcoidosis lesions could be differentiated from osseous metastases on MRI and sought to propose and evaluate features distinguishing these entities. MATERIALS AND METHODS. MR images obtained at 1.5 T of 34 subjects (22 with osseous metastatic disease, 12 with osseous sarcoidosis) with 79 single or multiple bone lesions (40 metastatic, 39 sarcoidal) were reviewed independently by two blinded, experienced musculoskeletal radiologists. Fluid-sensitive and T1-weighted images were viewed separately. Proposed discriminating features were peri- or intralesional fat, specified border characteristics, and the presence of an extraosseous soft-tissue mass. An additional feature for spinal lesions was posterior element involvement. On the basis of these criteria, the readers provided a binary diagnosis and confidence score. RESULTS. The overall sensitivity for both readers was 46.3% and specificity, 97.4%. T1- weighted images were associated with higher sensitivity than T2-weighted images (59.0% vs 34.1%, respectively; p = 0.025) and with comparable specificity (97.6% vs 97.2%, p = 0.91). Diagnostic accuracy was higher using the discriminators of a mass or posterior element involvement for metastasis (83.3%) than border characteristics (68.0%) or lesion fat (65.0%) for sarcoidosis; the latter two features provided near 100% specificity but poor sensitivity (14.3% and 0%, respectively). Readers reported higher confidence diagnosing osseous sarcoidosis lesions than metastatic lesions, with a trend for higher confidence with T1-weighted images (p = 0.088). CONCLUSION. Osseous sarcoidosis lesions cannot be reliably distinguished from metastatic lesions on routine MRI studies by readers experienced in evaluating these lesions.
机译:目的。 MRI揭示的结节病病灶的轴向骨骼和长骨类似于骨转移,可能导致潜在的重大误诊。我们假设在MRI上可以将骨结节病病变与骨转移区分开,并试图提出和评估区分这些实体的特征。材料和方法。两名盲人,经验丰富的肌肉骨骼放射科医生独立审查了34位受试者(22例骨转移性疾病,12例骨结节性骨病)在1.5 T时获得的MR图像,这些病变具有79个单发或多发性骨病变(40例转移性,39例结骨)。分别查看流体敏感图像和T1加权图像。建议的鉴别特征是病灶周围或病灶内的脂肪,特定的边界特征以及骨外软组织肿块的存在。脊柱病变的另一个特征是后部受累。根据这些标准,读者提供了二进制诊断和置信度得分。结果。两位读者的总体敏感性为46.3%,特异性为97.4%。 T1加权图像的敏感性高于T2加权图像(分别为59.0%和34.1%; p = 0.025)和可比的特异性(97.6%和97.2%,p = 0.91)。使用鉴别诊断为转移的肿块或后方因素(83.3%)要比结节病的边界特征(68.0%)或病灶脂肪(65.0%)要高。后两个特征提供了接近100%的特异性,但敏感性较差(分别为14.3%和0%)。读者报告说,与转移性病变相比,诊断骨性结节病病变的置信度更高,对于T1加权图像,置信度更高(p = 0.088)。结论。在常规MRI研究中,经验丰富的读者无法可靠地将骨结节病病变与转移性病变区分开。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号