...
首页> 外文期刊>AJR: American Journal of Roentgenology : Including Diagnostic Radiology, Radiation Oncology, Nuclear Medicine, Ultrasonography and Related Basic Sciences >Detection and grading of esophageal varices on liver CT: comparison of standard and thin-section multiplanar reconstructions in diagnostic accuracy.
【24h】

Detection and grading of esophageal varices on liver CT: comparison of standard and thin-section multiplanar reconstructions in diagnostic accuracy.

机译:肝CT食管静脉曲张的检测和分级:标准和薄层多平面重建在诊断准确性上的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to evaluate the performance of liver CT in the diagnosis of esophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis and to determine whether thin-section multiplanar reconstructions (MPRs) improve accuracy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 109 patients with cirrhosis who underwent endoscopy within 10 weeks after dual-phase liver MDCT supplemented with thin-section axial and coronal portal venous phase reconstructions. Two blinded radiologists independently evaluated each CT examination for the presence and sizes of varices using standard 5-mm axial versus 1- to 3-mm multiplanar images in separate sessions. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value calculations and receiver operating characteristic analysis were performed using endoscopy as the reference standard. Interobserver variability and correlation of CT size to variceal grade were assessed. RESULTS: Twenty-six cases of high-risk esophageal varices were identified; all except two were detected on CT by one of the readers on standard 5-mm images. For both readers, sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) for the discrimination of high-risk varices using a criterion of 2 mm or greater were nearly the same for the standard 5-mm images versus the 1- to 3-mm multiplanar images (sensitivity and NPV: reader 1, 96% and 98% vs 96% and 99%; reader 2, and 89% and 95% vs 89% and 96%, respectively). Standard 5-mm images yielded a lower specificity for high-risk esophageal varices than the thin-section multiplanar images, and this difference was statistically significant for reader 2. Substantial interobserver agreement was noted for both esophageal varices detection and size measurements. CONCLUSION: Standard liver CT is sensitive for the detection of high-risk varices and deserves further investigation as a potential cost-effective screening tool for the evaluation of patients with cirrhosis. The addition of 1- to 3-mm MPRs may increase specificity for risk stratification based on size measurements.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是评估肝硬化患者食管静脉曲张的肝脏CT诊断性能,并确定薄层多平面重建(MPR)是否能提高准确性。材料与方法:我们确定了109例肝硬化患者,他们在双相肝脏MDCT补充有薄层轴向和冠状动脉门静脉相重建后的10周内接受了内镜检查。两名不知情的放射线医师分别使用标准的5毫米轴向与1毫米至3毫米多平面图像,分别评估每次CT检查静脉曲张的存在和大小。使用内窥镜检查作为参考标准进行敏感性,特异性和预测值计算以及受体工作特征分析。评估了观察者间的变异性以及CT大小与静脉曲张分级的相关性。结果:鉴定出高危食管静脉曲张26例。读取器之一在标准5毫米图像上在CT上检测到了除两个以外的所有图像。对于两个读者来说,对于标准的5毫米图像与1到3毫米多平面图像,使用2毫米或更大的标准来区分高风险静脉曲张的敏感性和阴性预测值(NPV)几乎相同(灵敏度和NPV:阅读器1、96%和98%与96%和99%;阅读器2、89%和95%与89%和96%)。标准的5毫米图像对高风险食管静脉曲张的特异性低于薄层多平面图像,这种差异对阅读器2具有统计学意义。在食管静脉曲张检测和尺寸测量方面,观察者之间均达成了共识。结论:标准肝CT对高风险静脉曲张的检测敏感,值得作为肝硬化患者评估的潜在成本效益筛查工具进行进一步研究。添加1至3毫米的MPR可能会增加基于尺寸测量的风险分层的特异性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号