...
首页> 外文期刊>AJR: American Journal of Roentgenology : Including Diagnostic Radiology, Radiation Oncology, Nuclear Medicine, Ultrasonography and Related Basic Sciences >Benefits of contrast-enhanced sonography for the detection of liver lesions: comparison with histologic findings.
【24h】

Benefits of contrast-enhanced sonography for the detection of liver lesions: comparison with histologic findings.

机译:超声造影检查对肝脏病变检测的好处:与组织学检查结果的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to compare the usefulness of contrast-enhanced sonography with baseline sonography in detecting malignant liver lesions. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This prospective study included 116 patients. All patients underwent a preoperative conventional sonography examination followed by sonography after injection of contrast agent combined with the use of perfusion software (vascular recognition imaging or pulse subtraction imaging). Histopathologic analysis was the reference standard used to compare the diagnostic value of baseline sonography versus contrast-enhanced sonography. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients underwent hepatic surgery, 31 did not because of disseminated lesions, and the remaining three patients did not meet inclusion criteria. Three hundred six surgically proven lesions were taken into account for comparison of the two techniques: 147 were detected on baseline sonography and 177 on contrast-enhanced sonography. Histopathologic analysis revealed 233 malignantand 73 benign lesions. Sensitivity and specificity were improved on contrast-enhanced sonography compared with baseline sonography for the detection of malignant lesions: 68.7% versus 58.8% and 67% versus 50.7%, respectively. Contrast-enhanced sonography detected 23 additional malignant lesions that had been seen as lacuna at the portal venous phase and characterized as 19 benign nodules, thus improving the performance of sonography in 13.7% of the cases. CONCLUSION: Contrast injection improved the sensitivity and specificity of baseline sonography and should be performed in routine practice if hepatic surgery is being considered for the management of liver lesions.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是比较超声造影与基线超声在检测肝恶性病变中的作用。受试者和方法:这项前瞻性研究包括116例患者。所有患者均接受术前常规超声检查,然后在注射造影剂后结合灌注软件(血管识别成像或脉冲减影成像)进行超声检查。组织病理学分析是用于比较基线超声检查与对比超声检查的诊断价值的参考标准。结果:82例患者接受了肝脏手术,其中31例不是因为弥散性病变,其余3例患者未达到入选标准。为了比较这两种技术,考虑了三百六十六种经手术证实的病变:基线超声检查发现147例,造影剂超声检查发现177例。组织病理学分析发现有233例恶性病变和73例良性病变。与基线超声检查相比,造影增强超声检查对恶性病变的敏感性和特异性得到了改善:分别为68.7%,58.8%和67%和50.7%。超声造影检查发现另外23例恶性病变,在门静脉期被视为腔隙,并表现为19个良性结节,因此在13.7%的病例中改善了超声检查的性能。结论:对比剂注射可提高基线超声检查的敏感性和特异性,如果考虑考虑采用肝外科手术治疗肝脏病变,则应在常规实践中进行。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号