...
【24h】

Assessment of global right ventricular function on 64-MDCT compared with MRI.

机译:与MRI相比,评估64-MDCT对整体右心室功能的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare ECG-gated 64-MDCT with MRI for the assessment of global right ventricular (RV) function from coronary CT angiography data. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight patients (25 men, 13 women; mean age +/- SD, 55.0 +/- 8.8 years) with suspected coronary artery disease underwent contrast-enhanced 64-MDCT (64 x 0.6 mm, 120 kV, 770 mAs(eff)) and 1.5-T MRI (balanced fast-field echo; TR/TE, 3.3/1.6; flip angle, 60 degrees ; 50 phases). Double oblique short-axis MDCT and MR images were used for further analysis. End-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), stroke volume (SV), and ejection fraction (EF) were computed from manually drawn endocardial contours of the right ventricle. For statistical analysis, repeated-measures analysis of variance and Pearson's correlation coefficients were calculated. Bland-Altman plots were computed. RESULTS: In general, RV volumes calculated from 64-MDCT agreed well with those calculated from MRI. The mean EF (+/- SD) calculated from MDCT and MRI was 51.0% +/- 7.8% and 51.4% +/- 7.3%, respectively. An excellent correlation was observed for EDV (r = 0.99), ESV (r = 0.98), SV (r = 0.98), and EF (r = 0.97). Bland-Altman plots showed no systematic variation between MDCT and MRI data. No statistically significant differences (p < or = 0.05) between the techniques were found. CONCLUSION: Although contrast injection is optimized for visualization of the coronary arteries, retrospectively ECG-gated 64-MDCT permits reliable assessment of global RV function.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是比较ECG门控64-MDCT与MRI从冠状动脉CT血管造影数据中评估整体右心室(RV)功能。研究对象和方法:38例疑似冠状动脉疾病的患者(男25例,女13例;平均年龄+/- SD,55.0 +/- 8.8岁)接受了对比增强的64-MDCT(64 x 0.6 mm,120 kV, 770 mAs(eff))和1.5-T MRI(平衡快场回波; TR / TE,3.3 / 1.6;翻转角,60度; 50相)。双斜短轴MDCT和MR图像用于进一步分析。舒张末期容积(EDV),收缩末期容积(ESV),中风容积(SV)和射血分数(EF)由右心室的手动心内膜轮廓计算得出。为了进行统计分析,计算了方差和皮尔逊相关系数的重复测量分析。计算了Bland-Altman图。结果:通常,根据64-MDCT计算得出的RV量与根据MRI计算得出的相符。根据MDCT和MRI计算得出的平均EF(+/- SD)分别为51.0%+/- 7.8%和51.4%+/- 7.3%。对于EDV(r = 0.99),ESV(r = 0.98),SV(r = 0.98)和EF(r = 0.97),观察到极好的相关性。 Bland-Altman图显示MDCT和MRI数据之间没有系统的变化。两种技术之间未发现统计学上的显着差异(p <或= 0.05)。结论:尽管对比剂注射已优化用于冠状动脉的可视化,但回顾性地心电门控64-MDCT可以可靠地评估整体RV功能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号