...
首页> 外文期刊>AJR: American Journal of Roentgenology : Including Diagnostic Radiology, Radiation Oncology, Nuclear Medicine, Ultrasonography and Related Basic Sciences >MRI small-bowel follow-through: prone versus supine patient positioning for best small-bowel distention and lesion detection.
【24h】

MRI small-bowel follow-through: prone versus supine patient positioning for best small-bowel distention and lesion detection.

机译:MRI小肠随访:俯卧与仰卧患者定位,以实现最佳小肠扩张和病变检测。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess whether prone or supine imaging provides superior small-bowel loop distention during MRI small-bowel follow-through examinations and whether either position is better with regard to lesion detection and evaluation. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Forty consecutively enrolled clinically referred patients with known or suspected small-bowel abnormalities prospectively underwent 62 MRI small-bowel follow-through examinations in both the prone and the supine positions. Images were blindly and independently reviewed by two observers. Each small-bowel segment was assessed with a 3-point scoring system, and differences in bowel distention in the prone and supine positions were evaluated with a paired Wilcoxon's test. Differences between rates of lesion detection and characterization (e.g., ulceration, stricturing) were analyzed with a paired Student's t test. Interobserver agreement was estimated with the kappa coefficient. RESULTS: In both normal and diseased small bowel, the prone position had statistically significantly higher distention scores than did the supine position (p 0.05) with a high level of interobserver agreement. This finding, however, did not translate into improved lesion detection or characterization (p 0.05). CONCLUSION: Although use of the prone position results in superior small-bowel distention during MRI small-bowel follow-through, both the prone and supine positions are equal in terms of lesion detection and feature visualization.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是评估俯卧或仰卧成像在MRI小肠随访检查期间是否提供了优越的小肠loop肿胀,以及在病变检测和评估方面,哪个位置更好。研究对象和方法:连续入选40例临床转诊的已知或疑似小肠异常患者,分别在俯卧位和仰卧位接受62例MRI小肠随访检查。图像由两名观察员盲目地独立检查。每个小肠段均通过三分评分系统进行评估,并通过配对的Wilcoxon检验评估俯卧位和仰卧位肠蠕动的差异。使用配对的学生t检验分析了病变检出率和检定率(例如溃疡,狭窄)之间的差异。观察者之间的协议是用kappa系数估算的。结果:在正常和患病的小肠中,俯卧位的扩张评分在统计学上均显着高于仰卧位(p <0.05),观察者之间的同意水平很高。然而,这一发现并未转化为改善的病变检测或表征(p> 0.05)。结论:尽管俯卧位在MRI小肠切除术中可导致小肠上溢,但在病变检测和特征可视化方面,俯卧位和仰卧位均相等。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号