...
首页> 外文期刊>Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment: An International Journal for Scientific Research on the Relationship of Agriculture and Food Production to the Biosphere >The Ridgefield Multiple Ecosystem Services Experiment: can restoration of former agricultural land achieve multiple outcomes? (Recent advances in restoration ecology: Examining the modern Australian agro-ecological and post-mining landscapes.)
【24h】

The Ridgefield Multiple Ecosystem Services Experiment: can restoration of former agricultural land achieve multiple outcomes? (Recent advances in restoration ecology: Examining the modern Australian agro-ecological and post-mining landscapes.)

机译:里奇菲尔德(Ridgefield)多生态系统服务实验:恢复以前的农地能否取得多重成果? (恢复生态学的最新进展:研究现代澳大利亚农业生态和采矿后的景观。)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The ability of restoration approaches to provide valued ecosystem services needs to be assessed. The emerging carbon market provides an incentive to afforest agricultural landscapes and could potentially achieve multiple outcomes. However, planting monocultures for carbon sequestration may preclude effective delivery of other ecosystem services. Here, we describe the rationale behind the Ridgefield Multiple Ecosystem Services Experiment, a long-term investigation into trade-offs that might prevent the simultaneous provision of high levels of multiple services in the agricultural landscape of south-western Australia. We compare a monoculture treatment of a fast growing native species (Eucalyptus loxophleba) with mixtures of 2, 4 or 8 native plant species. We selected species based on different traits that we predict will relate to the provision of different levels of multiple ecosystem services. We ask: Can restoration of multiple ecosystem services be achieved along with carbon sequestration? Nested treatments of nitrogen deposition and weed removal test whether ecosystem service outcomes respond to environmental changes. We show that historical land-use at the site has the potential to affect service delivery via different soil characteristics and survival of planted species. Ridgefield tests the possibility of restoring and managing agricultural landscapes for multiple ecosystem services, providing a much needed experimental investigation of trade-offs among ecosystem functions.
机译:需要评估恢复方法提供有价值的生态系统服务的能力。新兴的碳市场为绿化农业景观提供了动力,并有可能取得多重成果。但是,种植单一植物进行固碳可能会妨碍其他生态系统服务的有效提供。在这里,我们描述了Ridgefield多重生态系统服务实验背后的原理,这是一项长期权衡取舍的调查,这种取舍可能会阻止在澳大利亚西南部农业景观中同时提供高水平的多重服务。我们比较了快速生长的本地物种(桉树)与2、4或8种本地植物物种的混合物的单培养处理。我们根据预测的不同特征选择了物种,这些特征将与提供不同水平的多种生态系统服务有关。我们问:碳固存可以实现多种生态系统服务的恢复吗?氮沉降和除草的嵌套处理测试了生态系统服务成果是否响应环境变化。我们表明,该地点的历史土地利用有可能通过不同的土壤特征和种植物种的生存状况影响服务的提供。 Ridgefield测试了为多种生态系统服务恢复和管理农业景观的可能性,为生态系统功能之间的折衷提供了急需的实验研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号