...
首页> 外文期刊>Critical reviews in oncology/hematology >Management of 'unfavourable' carcinoma of unknown primary site: Synthesis of recent literature
【24h】

Management of 'unfavourable' carcinoma of unknown primary site: Synthesis of recent literature

机译:原发部位未知的“不利”癌的治疗:最新文献综述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Carcinomas of unknown primary (CUP) approximately represent 2-3% of all adult cancers. Various clinicopathological subsets of CUP have been identified, which may be treated with tailored approaches. Nevertheless, 80% of CUP do not fall into these subsets. Even when at least 4 prognostic models have been developed and validated in independent patient cohorts, there is no consensus or reliable guidance for estimating the prognosis of these "unfavourable" CUP. Consequently, targeting patients who benefit from palliative chemotherapy is difficult. Thirty-eight phase II trials were published between 1997 and 2011; a systematic analysis of these trials did not allow the recommendation of any of the tested regimens as a standard of care. Currently, there is only one published phase III clinical trial (Paclitaxel/carboplatin/etoposide versus gemcitabine/irinotecan); without significant difference between both regimens. Thus, with the promise of molecular profiling, we are waiting for a large collaborative clinical trial that validates the concept of targeted treatment in this population of patients with "unfavourable" CUP.
机译:原发性未知癌(CUP)约占所有成人癌症的2-3%。已经确定了CUP的各种临床病理亚型,可以使用量身定制的方法对其进行治疗。但是,80%的CUP不会属于这些子集。即使已经在独立的患者队列中开发并验证了至少4种预后模型,也没有共识或可靠的指导来评估这些“不利”的CUP的预后。因此,很难从姑息化疗中获益。 1997年至2011年发表了38项II期临床试验;对这些试验的系统分析不允许将任何经过测试的治疗方案推荐为护理标准。目前,只有一项已发表的III期临床试验(紫杉醇/卡铂/依托泊苷与吉西他滨/伊立替康)。两种方案之间无明显差异。因此,随着分子谱分析技术的发展,我们正在等待一项大型的合作临床试验,该试验将验证这种针对“不良” CUP患者的靶向治疗的概念。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号