...
首页> 外文期刊>Critical reviews in oncology/hematology >Systematic review of efficacy of dose-dense versus non-dose-dense chemotherapy in breast cancer, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and non-small cell lung cancer
【24h】

Systematic review of efficacy of dose-dense versus non-dose-dense chemotherapy in breast cancer, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and non-small cell lung cancer

机译:系统性综述了在乳腺癌,非霍奇金淋巴瘤和非小细胞肺癌中进行剂量密集与非剂量密集化疗的疗效

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have suggested a potential advantage of dose-dense chemotherapy in improving disease-free and overall survival in patients with certain malignancies. This systematic review summarizes the literature on the efficacy of dose-dense chemotherapy across various cancers (breast cancer, non-Hodgkin lymphoma [NHL], and non-small cell lung cancer) and chemotherapy regimens. Among the 17 trials identified, few reported statistically significant differences between dose-dense and standard chemotherapy, and most were small with limited statistical power. Statistically significant differences in overall survival favoring dose-dense schedules were apparent among large RCTs in potentially curative settings such as early-stage breast cancer and NHL. Clinical and treatment heterogeneity demonstrated the flexibility of the dose-dense paradigm but also precluded quantitative meta-analysis of results. Further study of dose-dense schedules based on large RCTs is needed to demonstrate the consistency and generalizability of these findings.
机译:随机对照试验(RCT)表明,剂量密集型化疗在改善某些恶性肿瘤患者的无病生存和总体生存方面具有潜在优势。该系统综述总结了有关剂量密集型化疗在各种癌症(乳腺癌,非霍奇金淋巴瘤[NHL]和非小细胞肺癌)和化疗方案中的疗效的文献。在确定的17项试验中,很少有报道说剂量密集和标准化疗之间存在统计学上的显着差异,并且大多数是较小的,且统计能力有限。在大型RCT中,在可能治愈的环境(例如早期乳腺癌和NHL)中,总体生存期具有统计学意义的明显差异(有利于剂量密集计划)。临床和治疗的异质性证明了剂量密集范式的灵活性,但也排除了对结果进行定量荟萃分析的可能性。需要进一步研究基于大型RCT的剂量密集计划,以证明这些发现的一致性和普遍性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号