首页> 外文期刊>Journal of natural gas science and engineering >Weight on drill bit prediction models: Sugeno-type and Mamdani-type fuzzy inference systems compared
【24h】

Weight on drill bit prediction models: Sugeno-type and Mamdani-type fuzzy inference systems compared

机译:钻头预测模型的权重:Sugeno型和Mamdani型模糊推理系统的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Drilling optimization aims to optiniize controllable variables during drilling operations, such as weight on bit (WOB), in order to improve drilling rate of penetration and reduce well costs. Prediction models of Weight on Bit (WOB) are developed using two widely-applied fuzzy inference systems (FIS), Mamdani-type and Sugeno-type, for the Ahwaz oil field and Marun gas field formations; two large producing fields in Iran. The FIS are constructed based on field data involving multiple wells; six wells from Ahwaz field, and two wells from Marun field. The controllable input variable data for the FIS includes: rate of penetration, mud weight, formation type, pump pressure, pump flow rate and rotation rate. The key difference between these two FIS techniques is the manner in which they calculate their crisp output values. The Mamdani-type FIS requires defuzzification, whereas the Sugeno-type FIS applies a constant weighted-average technique avoiding defuzzification. The results for the two field cases evaluated convincingly demonstrate that the Sugeno-type FIS is superior to the Mamdani-type FIS for WOB prediction using the same input data and membership functions. There is scope for further refinement of FIS models for WOB prediction (e.g., by adding bit type information) and the Sugeno-type FIS methods should reduce the time and cost associated with the conventional rate of penetration methods for predicting WOB. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:钻探优化的目的是在钻探操作期间优化可控制变量,例如钻压(WOB),以提高钻速和降低钻井成本。利用两个广泛应用的模糊推理系统(Mamdani型和Sugeno型)对阿瓦兹(Ahwaz)油田和马伦(Marun)气田进行了钻压预测模型(WOB)。伊朗的两个大型生产区。 FIS是根据涉及多口井的现场数据构建的;阿瓦兹(Ahwaz)油田有6口井,马伦(Marun)油田有2口井。 FIS的可控制输入变量数据包括:渗透率,泥浆重量,地层类型,泵压力,泵流量和转速。这两种FIS技术之间的主要区别在于它们计算其清晰输出值的方式。 Mamdani型FIS需要进行去模糊处理,而Sugeno型FIS采用恒定加权平均技术来避免进行去模糊处理。评估的两个现场案例的结果令人信服地表明,使用相同的输入数据和隶属函数,Sugeno型FIS优于Mamdani型FIS在WOB预测方面。存在用于WOB预测的FIS模型的进一步完善的空间(例如,通过添加位类型信息),并且Sugeno型FIS方法应减少与用于预测WOB的常规渗透率方法相关的时间和成本。 (C)2016 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号