...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of hand therapy: Official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists >Patterns of research utilization among Certified Hand Therapists
【24h】

Patterns of research utilization among Certified Hand Therapists

机译:认证的手部治疗师中的研究利用模式

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Study design: Mixed methods, cross-sectional. Introduction: Nearly 30% of Certified Hand Therapists rarely or never use research findings when treating carpal tunnel syndrome. Purpose of the study: To identify groups of CHTs with common research utilization patterns. Methods: National randomized mail survey of 600 CHTs (n = 308, RR = 55%). Latent class and thematic analysis of eight questions assessing research use and beliefs. Results: Four groups of CHT research users were identified: Analytic (n = 135, 45%); Skeptic (n = 65, 22%); Pragmatic (n = 53, 18%); and Traditional (n = 46, 15%). Highest research use was reported among Analytics and Pragmatics although Skeptics willingly relied on research evidence when it contradicted other sources of knowledge. Age, not experience or population density, was a significant covariate of group membership. Conclusions: Empowering CHTs to use research findings by increased understanding of their group membership, and understanding others' groups, may increase progress toward evidence-based practice.
机译:研究设计:混合方法,横截面。简介:近30%的经过认证的手部治疗师在治疗腕管综合症时很少或从未使用研究结果。研究目的:确定具有常见研究利用模式的CHT组。方法:全国随机邮件调查600个CHT(n = 308,RR = 55%)。对八个评估研究用途和信念的问题的潜在班级和主题分析。结果:确定了四类CHT研究用户:分析型(n = 135,45%);怀疑论者(n = 65,22%);务实的(n = 53,18%);和传统的(n = 46,15%)。尽管分析家和实用主义者在与其他知识来源相抵触的情况下仍愿意依靠研究证据,但据报道,在分析和语用学领域,研究使用最多。年龄,而不是经验或人口密度,是群体成员的重要协变量。结论:通过增加对小组成员的了解以及对其他小组的了解,赋予CHT使用研究结果的权力,可能会增加循证实践的进展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号