...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of hand therapy: Official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists >The Hamilton Inventory for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: A cognitive debriefing study of the clinician-based component
【24h】

The Hamilton Inventory for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: A cognitive debriefing study of the clinician-based component

机译:复杂区域性疼痛综合征的汉密尔顿量表:基于临床医生成分的认知汇报研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Study Design: Descriptive. Introduction: The Hamilton Inventory for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (HI-CRPS) is a multidisciplinary assessment tool under development. Purpose of the Study: This study examined the assessment practices, beliefs and preferences of health care professionals working with CRPS to inform the content and structure of the clinician-based portion of the HI-CRPS (CB-HI-CRPS), as well as refine the user manual. Methods: Semi-structured cognitive interviews were conducted with health care professionals from a spectrum of disciplines working with CRPS. Assessment practices and scaling preferences for 15 assessment concepts were collected, relating directly to items on the CB-HI-CRPS. Interviews were transcribed and coded with emergent themes. Results: Participants reported using the concepts from the CB-HI-CRPS 85.2% of the time. Physicians and nurses preferred present/absent judgements, while therapists used none/mild/moderate/severe scaling. Emerging themes highlighted assessment values, beliefs about CRPS, professional roles, and knowledge translation. Conclusions: Lack of uniformity in terminology and assessment behaviours underscores the need for clear scoring frameworks and standardized assessment instructions to improve reliability across the proposed users of the HI-CRPS.
机译:研究设计:描述性的。简介:汉密尔顿综合性区域疼痛综合征清单(HI-CRPS)是一种正在开发的多学科评估工具。研究目的:本研究检查了与CRPS合作的医疗保健专业人员的评估做法,信念和偏好,以告知HI-CRPS(CB-HI-CRPS)以及临床医生部分的内容和结构,以及完善用户手册。方法:与来自CRPS工作领域的医疗保健专业人员进行了半结构性认知访谈。收集了15个评估概念的评估实践和扩展偏好,这些概念直接与CB-HI-CRPS上的项目有关。采访被转录并以紧急主题进行编码。结果:参与者报告使用CB-HI-CRPS中概念的时间为85.2%。内科医生和护士倾向于现在/不在场的判断,而治疗师则不使用/轻度/中度/重度。新兴主题突出了评估价值,对CRPS的信念,专业角色和知识翻译。结论:术语和评估行为缺乏统一性,突显了对清晰评分框架和标准化评估说明的需求,以提高HI-CRPS拟议用户的可靠性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号