首页> 外文期刊>Journal of hand therapy: Official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists >Evaluation of interventions for rotator cuff pathology: A systematic review.
【24h】

Evaluation of interventions for rotator cuff pathology: A systematic review.

机译:评估肩袖病理的干预措施:系统评价。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A systematic review of published evidence was conducted investigating surgical and conservative management of rotator cuff disease. Medical databases searched included Medline, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), and the Cochrane Collaboration library. Two independent reviewers evaluated each article for inclusion. Established criteria were used to assess the methodologic quality of articles examining outcomes of treatment interventions for rotator cuff disease. Due to the low methodologic quality of the studies that are currently available in this area, there is insufficient evidence to strongly support or refute the effectiveness of any available treatment intervention for rotator cuff pathology. The best available evidence supports open and primary surgery over arthroscopic debridement and revision surgery; and in the area of conservative management, electrotherapy, steroid use, exercise therapy, and acupuncture. There is a clear need for more methodologically sound studies to achieve strong evidence on which treatment practices can be based.
机译:对已发表的证据进行了系统的回顾,以调查肩袖疾病的手术和保守治疗。搜索的医学数据库包括Medline,护理和专职健康文献累积索引(CINAHL),物理疗法证据数据库(PEDro)和Cochrane协作库。两名独立审稿人对每篇文章的收录情况进行了评估。建立的标准用于评估检查肩袖疾病治疗干预效果的文章的方法学质量。由于该领域目前研究的方法学质量低下,因此没有足够的证据来强有力地支持或驳斥对肩袖病理学的任何可用治疗干预措施的有效性。现有的最佳证据支持与关节镜清创术和翻修术相比的开放式和初级手术。在保守治疗,电疗,类固醇使用,运动疗法和针灸领域。显然,需要进行更合理的方法研究,以获得可作为治疗实践依据的有力证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号