...
首页> 外文期刊>Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems >Testing effects of experimental design factors using multi-way analysis
【24h】

Testing effects of experimental design factors using multi-way analysis

机译:使用多向分析测试实验设计因素的效果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Analysing experimental design data is usually performed by analysis of variance (ANOVA). In situations where the higher orders of interactions hold the most relevant information, generalised multiplicative analysis of variance (GEMANOVA), which is based on parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC), may be a useful supplement to ANOVA. By GEMANOVA the information in the data is compressed down to a few multiplicative components describing the main variation in the data including relevant interaction phenomena. GEMANOVA is best used as an explorative tool. Still there is a need for validation criteria to assist the model building. In the present publication we present such a validation criterion for GEMANOVA models based on bootstrap methodology. The method is demonstrated on a data set consisting of a pot experiment, measuring the nitrogen-to-sulfur ratio in wheat grown under different fertilising schemes. It was found that GEMANOVA revealed complex patterns in the data which were unobservable by ANOVA.
机译:通常通过方差分析(ANOVA)来分析实验设计数据。在较高阶的交互关系包含最相关信息的情况下,基于并行因子分析(PARAFAC)的广义方差乘法分析(GEMANOVA)可能是ANOVA的有用补充。通过GEMANOVA,数据中的信息被压缩为几个可乘的成分,描述了数据的主要变化,包括相关的相互作用现象。 GEMANOVA最好用作探索工具。仍然需要验证标准来帮助建立模型。在本出版物中,我们提出了基于引导方法的GEMANOVA模型验证标准。该方法在由盆栽试验组成的数据集上得到证明,该试验测量了在不同施肥方案下种植的小麦中的氮硫比。发现GEMANOVA揭示了数据中的复杂模式,而ANOVA无法观察到这些模式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号