...
首页> 外文期刊>Traffic Injury Prevention >Fatalities of Children 0 - 7 Years Old in the Second Row
【24h】

Fatalities of Children 0 - 7 Years Old in the Second Row

机译:第二排0-7岁儿童的死亡人数

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective. The safety of children riding in the second-row of light vehicles remains an important issue. This study investigates fatal accidents of children 0-7 years old by seating position and principal direction of force. It considers the number of fatalities, exposure, and risk. Methods. The 1996-2005 FARS was analyzed for occupant fatalities by age (0-7 and ≥8 years old), seating position (front, second, and third-row, and left, middle and right) and principal direction of force (1-12 o'clock PDOF, rollover, and other/unknown). Light vehicles were included with model year 1990+. The 1996-2005 NASS-CDS was similarly analyzed for occupant exposure. Fatality risk was defined as the number of fatalities in FARS divided by the exposure from NASS-CDS for each seating position and crash direction. Results. Two thirds (67.8%) of 0- to 7-year-old child fatalities occupied second-row-seats in FARS. A nearly equal number died in rollovers (20.3%), front impacts (20.2%), and side crashes (19.6%). About 354 deaths occur to second-row-seated children annually. A majority (76.6%) of children ride in the second-row based on tow away crashes in NASS-CDS. Most are exposed to front impacts (41.6%), followed by side impacts (16.5%). Rollovers are the lowest frequency (5.0%). However, fatality risk is highest in rollovers (1.37%), followed by right-side (0.47%) and left-side impacts (0.34%). Near-seated children in the second-row have a 3.04% fatality risk for right-side (3 o'clock) impacts. This is nearly twice the 1.53% risk for near-side second-row children in left-side (9 o'clock) impacts. Overall, right-side impacts have a 37% higher fatality risk than left-side impacts, irrespective of second-row seating position. The second-row has a 43.4% lower fatality risk than the front seat (0.30% v 0.53%) and the third-row is 58.5% lower (0.22% v 0.53%) for 0- to 7-year-old children. Overall, children seated behind the driver have an 8.1% lower fatality risk than those seated behind the right-front passenger, although the center second-row-seat has the lowest risk (0.27%). Children in the second-row have a 65-71% lower fatality risk than the driver with the lowest relative risk in the center second-row-seat (0.29) and highest in the second-row right position (0.35). Conclusions. Children seated behind the driver have a lower fatality risk than those seated behind the right-front passenger. The higher risk to right second-row children is from near-side impacts at 3-4 o'clock and rollovers. In terms of priorities, rollovers, side impacts, and frontal crashes cause most fatalities. The highest risks for 0- to 7-year-old children in the second-row are in near-side impacts and rollovers.
机译:目的。轻型车辆第二排儿童的安全仍然是一个重要问题。本研究通过座位位置和主要用力方向调查了0-7岁儿童的致命事故。它考虑了死亡人数,暴露量和风险。方法。对1996-2005年FARS进行了按年龄(0-7岁和≥8岁),就座位置(前排,第二排和第三排以及左,中和右)和主力方向(1- 12点PDOF,翻转和其他/未知)。轻型汽车已包含在1990年+车型年中。对1996-2005年NASS-CDS的乘员暴露进行了类似的分析。死亡风险定义为FARS中的死亡人数除以每个座位位置和坠落方向的NASS-CDS暴露量。结果。 0至7岁儿童死亡中有三分之二(67.8%)占据了FARS的第二排座位。翻车事故(20.3%),前撞事故(20.2%)和侧撞事故(19.6%)几乎相等。每年,第二排座位的儿童大约有354人死亡。由于NASS-CDS发生拖曳坠毁,大多数(76.6%)儿童进入第二排。大多数人受到正面撞击(41.6%),其次是侧面撞击(16.5%)。翻转是最低频率(5.0%)。但是,死亡风险在流失率中最高(1.37%),其次是右侧(0.47%)和左侧影响(0.34%)。第二排的近座儿童在右侧(3点钟)撞击时有3.04%的死亡风险。这几乎是左侧(9点钟)发生撞击的近端第二排儿童的1.53%风险的两倍。总体而言,无论第二排座位位置如何,右侧撞击比左侧撞击的死亡风险高37%。对于0至7岁的儿童,第二排的死亡率比前排(0.30%v 0.53%)低43.4%,第三排的死亡率降低08.5至7岁儿童的58.5%(0.22%v 0.53%)。总体而言,坐在中间的第二排座位的驾驶员罹患死亡的风险比坐在右前排乘客下方的儿童的致死风险低8.1%,尽管该风险最低(0.27%)。与第二排中间位置的相对风险最低(0.29),第二排右侧位置的最高(0.35)的驾驶员相比,第二排儿童的死亡风险低65-71%。结论。坐在司机后面的孩子比坐在右前排乘客后面的孩子的死亡风险更低。右侧第二排儿童的较高风险是在3-4点和翻滚的近侧冲击。就优先事项而言,侧翻,侧面碰撞和正面碰撞会导致大多数人员死亡。第二行中0至7岁儿童的最大风险是在近侧撞击和侧翻。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号