...
首页> 外文期刊>Psychology and psychotherapy: Theory,research and practice >The relationship between social deprivation and unilateral termination (attrition) from psychotherapy at various stages of the health care pathway.
【24h】

The relationship between social deprivation and unilateral termination (attrition) from psychotherapy at various stages of the health care pathway.

机译:在医疗保健途径的各个阶段,社会剥夺与心理治疗导致的单方面终止(减员)之间的关系。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The relationship between social deprivation and attrition from psychotherapy was examined at various stages of the health care pathway. Data providing information on service users' discharge status gave a measure of attrition at different stages along this pathway. On the basis of their postcode, service users were allocated a Townsend deprivation score, which is a measure of social deprivation. Of the sample, 60% terminated therapy prior to agreed discharge at various pathway stages. Service users who failed to attend their first appointment had significantly higher social deprivation scores than those who completed therapy. Early terminators, who stopped attending before their fifth session, had a significantly higher level of social deprivation than the late terminators, and those who completed therapy. The late terminators did not significantly differ from completers on social deprivation. These results support earlier findings showing that socio-economic status influences attrition from therapy. However, socioeconomic status only affects two stages of the pathway - attendance at the first appointment, and the early stage of attending therapy. It does not affect earlier or later stages of the pathway. Applying the health action process approach (HAPA) model to the results, the action/maintenance stage can be represented by attendance for therapy. Socio-economic status influences this stage of the model, because social support and resources are important determinants for compliance. Earlier stages, characterized by HAPA as a decisional/motivation stage thought to be influenced by beliefs, was not affected by social deprivation. It is concluded that attrition from therapy should be studied separately for each pathway stage. Earlier conflicting findings on causes of attrition may have resulted from studying different combinations of pathway stages.
机译:在卫生保健途径的各个阶段,都研究了社会剥夺与心理治疗减员之间的关系。提供有关服务使用者出院状态信息的数据可以衡量该途径在不同阶段的损耗。根据他们的邮政编码,为服务用户分配了Townsend剥夺评分,这是对社会剥夺的一种度量。在样本中,有60%的人在各个阶段的出院前同意终止治疗。未能参加首次约会的服务使用者的社会剥夺得分明显高于完成治疗的使用者。早期终止者在第五届会议之前停止参加会议,其社会剥夺程度明显高于晚期终止者和完成治疗者。较晚的终结者与完成社会剥夺的终结者没有显着差异。这些结果支持了较早的发现,表明社会经济状况会影响治疗人员的减员。但是,社会经济状况仅影响该途径的两个阶段-首次预约时的出勤率和治疗初期。它不影响该途径的早期或晚期。将健康行动过程方法(HAPA)模型应用于结果,行动/维持阶段可以由参加治疗来代表。社会经济地位影响模型的这一阶段,因为社会支持和资源是遵守法规的重要决定因素。早期阶段,以HAPA为特征的决策/动机阶段被认为受信念的影响,而不受社会剥夺的影响。得出的结论是,对于每个途径阶段,应分别研究治疗的损耗。关于损耗原因的早期矛盾发现可能是通过研究通路阶段的不同组合得出的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号