...
首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Special Needs Education >Disproportionality in special education: identifying children with emotional behavioural difficulties in Irish primary schools
【24h】

Disproportionality in special education: identifying children with emotional behavioural difficulties in Irish primary schools

机译:特殊教育中的不成比例:在爱尔兰小学中识别出情绪行为障碍儿童

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Within categories of special educational needs, emotional and behavioural difficulties have received much attention in recent years, particularly in relation to their definition and identification by parents and teachers. This paper stems from previous research which highlights how children from disadvantaged backgrounds and those attending schools designated as socio-economically disadvantaged are significantly more likely than their peers to be identified as having a special educational need of a non-normative type such as emotional behavioural difficulty (EBD). Using data from the Growing Up in Ireland study, it examines whether the EBD identified by teachers or within certain schools is matched by the child’s own performance on an internationally validated emotional and mental health measure - the Piers-Harris. Findings show that overall self-reported social emotional well-being bears a strong relationship to the probability of being identified with an EBD. However, boys, children from economically inactive and one-parent households and children attending the most disadvantaged school contexts are more likely to be identified with having an EBD, even after taking into account their social background characteristics and their scoring on the Piers-Harris measure. These findings suggest that the subjective nature of EBD identification is resulting in a disproportionate number of these children being identified with EBD. The implications of this study are explored for existing disability/SEN classification systems, school-wide intervention models and the impact on individual students labelled as EBD. Overall, the findings pose searching questions about the validity of employing SEN classification systems in deciding eligibility and types of appropriate provision.View full textDownload full textKeywordsspecial educational needs, emotional behavioural difficulty (EBD), disproportionality, gender, socio-economic backgroundRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2012.669111
机译:在特殊教育需求的类别中,近年来情绪和行为上的困难得到了广泛的关注,尤其是在父母和老师对它们的定义和识别方面。本文源于先前的研究,该研究着重介绍了处于不利地位的儿童以及被指定为社会经济处于不利地位的学校的孩子比同龄人更有可能被确定为具有非规范性类型的特殊教育需求,例如情感行为困难(EBD)。使用来自爱尔兰的成长研究的数据,该研究检查了教师或某些学校确定的EBD是否与孩子在国际认可的情绪和心理健康衡量标准-Piers-Harris上的表现相匹配。研究结果表明,自我报告的总体社会情感状况与被EBD识别的可能性密切相关。但是,即使考虑到男孩的社会背景特征和他们在Piers-Harris测验中的得分,也更容易将男孩,经济不活跃的孩子和单亲家庭的孩子以及就读于最不利学校环境的孩子确定为患有EBD的人。 。这些发现表明,EBD鉴定的主观性质导致这些儿童被EBD鉴定的比例不成比例。本研究对现有的残疾/ S​​EN分类系统,全校干预模型以及对标为EBD的个别学生的影响进行了探讨。总体而言,这些发现提出了有关使用SEN分类系统来确定适当提供的资格和类型的有效性的搜索问题。查看全文下载全文关键词特殊教育需求,情感行为困难(EBD),不成比例,性别,社会经济背景相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“ Taylor&Francis Online”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2012.669111

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号