首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Egocentric and Allocentric Localization During Induced Motion
【2h】

Egocentric and Allocentric Localization During Induced Motion

机译:运动过程中的以自我为中心和同心为中心的定位

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This research examined motor measures of the apparent egocentric location and perceptual measures of the apparent allocentric location of a target that was being seen to undergo induced motion (IM). In Experiments 1 and 3, subjects fixated a stationary dot (IM target) while a rectangular surround stimulus (inducing stimulus) oscillated horizontally. The inducing stimulus motion caused the IM target to appear to move in the opposite direction. In Experiment 1, two dots (flashed targets) were flashed above and below the IM target when the surround had reached its leftmost or rightmost displacement from the subject’s midline. Subjects pointed open loop at either the apparent egocentric location of the IM target or at the bottom of the two flashed targets. On separate trials, subjects made judgments of the Vernier alignment of the IM target with the flashed targets at the endpoints of the surround’s oscillation. The pointing responses were displaced in the direction of the previously seen IM for the IM target and to a lesser degree for the bottom flashed target. However, the allocentric Vernier judgments demonstrated no perceptual displacement of the IM target relative to the flashed targets. Thus, IM results in a dissociation of egocentric location measures from allocentric location measures. In Experiment 2, pointing and Vernier measures were obtained with stationary horizontally displaced surrounds and there was no dissociation of egocentric location measures from allocentric location measures. These results indicate that the Roelofs effect did not produce the pattern of results in Experiment 1. In Experiment 3, pointing and Vernier measures were obtained when the surround was at the midpoint of an oscillation. In this case, egocentric pointing responses were displaced in the direction of surround motion (opposite IM) for the IM target and to a greater degree for the bottom flashed target. However, there was no apparent displacement of the IM target relative to the flashed targets in the allocentric Vernier judgments. Therefore, in Experiment 3 egocentric location measures were again dissociated from allocentric location measures. The results of this experiment also demonstrate that IM does not generate an allocentric displacement illusion analogous to the “flash-lag” effect.
机译:这项研究检查了运动目标的表面自我中心位置和感知的目标表面异体中心位置的措施,该对象正在经历感应运动(IM)。在实验1和3中,受试者将固定的点(IM目标)固定,而矩形环绕刺激(诱导刺激)则水平振荡。诱导刺激运动导致IM目标似乎朝相反方向移动。在实验1中,当环绕声从主体中线到达最左或最右位移时,在IM目标上方和下方闪烁了两个点(闪烁的目标)。受试者将开环指向IM目标的明显自我中心位置或两个闪烁目标的底部。在单独的试验中,受试者对IM目标的Vernier对准与环绕振荡端点处闪烁的目标进行了判断。对于IM目标,指向响应的位置朝先前看到的IM方向移动,而对于底部闪烁的目标,指向响应的位置较小。但是,同心圆游标的判断没有显示IM目标相对于闪光目标的感知位移。因此,IM导致以自我为中心的位置度量与以同心为中心的位置度量分离。在实验2中,指向性和游标性测量是在静止的水平位移周围获得的,并且以自我为中心的位置测量与同心的位置测量没有分离。这些结果表明,在实验1中,Roelofs效应没有产生结果的模式。在实验3中,当环绕声处于振荡的中点时,将获得指向和游标测量。在这种情况下,对于IM目标,以自我为中心的指向响应在环绕运动的方向(与IM相反)上发生了位移,而对于底部闪烁的目标,则以更大的程度发生了位移。但是,在同心圆游标判断中,IM目标相对于闪光目标没有明显的位移。因此,在实验3中,以自我为中心的位置度量再次与同心为中心的位置度量分离。该实验的结果还表明,IM不会产生类似于“闪光滞后”效应的同心轴位移错觉。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号