牙本质过敏症三种治疗方法疗效对比研究

摘要

Objective:To compare the clinical curative effect of dentine hypersensitivity being treated by sodium fluoride,Nd:YAG laser irradiation and Gluma Desensitize. Method:127 patients with dentine hypersensitivity were collected and randomly divided into three groups:sodium fluoride treatment,laser irradiation treatment and Gluma Desensitize treatment,compared to its immediate effect after treatment and 6 months after the effect. Result:There were no significant difference between Gluma Desensitize groups and laser irradiation groups after immediate treatment,sodium fluoride groups showed poor effects by immediate treatment. By six months treatment,laser irradiation groups were better than sodium fluoride groups and Gluma Desensitize groups. Conclusion:Laser irradiation to treat dentine hypersensitivity locally has significantly clinical curative effect,Gluma Desensitize to treat dentine hypersensitivity locally has recent curative effect satisfaction,sodium fluoride to treat dentine hypersensitivity locally has no effect.%目的：观察氟化钠、Nd：YAG和GLUMA脱敏剂局部治疗牙本质过敏的临床疗效。方法：临床收集127例牙本质过敏的患者，随机数字表法分为三组，分别采用氟化钠甘油、Nd：YAG激光、GLUMA脱敏剂进行治疗，观察对比其治疗后即刻效果和6个月后效果。结果：Nd：YAG激光，GLUMA脱敏剂方法的即刻疗效比较差异无统计学意义，氟化钠甘油即刻疗效较前两者的疗效差；6个月后，Nd：YAG激光疗效优于GLUMA组和氟化钠甘油组。结论：对于牙本质过敏症患者，Nd：YAG激光治疗近期与远期效果满意，GLUMA脱敏剂方法近期疗效满意，75%氟化钠甘油治疗效果不理想。