首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Innovations in Economic Management and Social Science >The Practice of Intensive Nursing Skill Training in Clinical Nursing Teaching
【24h】

The Practice of Intensive Nursing Skill Training in Clinical Nursing Teaching

机译:临床护理教学中密集护理技能培训的实践

获取原文

摘要

To investigate the effect of intensive nursing skills in clinical teaching. Method Selecting 60 students of nursing in our school, randomly divided into control group (30 cases) and observation group (30 cases). The control group uses routine nursing skills, and the observation group uses intensive nursing skills. Then compare the scores of OSCE, the score of clinical comprehensive ability and the total satisfaction of training methods between the two groups. Result Two groups of students' scores of OSCE had no significant difference before training (p> 0.05), the OSCE assessment scores were significantly improved after training. OSCE scores comparison before training (p = 0.7219, p = 0.3876, p = 0.9223, p = 0.2434); OSCE scores comparison after training (p = 0.0221, p = 0.0328, p = 0.0000, p = 0.0000). Two groups of students' clinical comprehensive ability scores before training had no significant difference (P> 0.05), after training the scores of clinical comprehensive ability has significantly improved. Clinical comprehensive ability comparison before training (p = 0.3062, p = 0.9516, p = 0.4420, p = 0.7776); clinical comprehensive ability comparison after training (p = 0.0332, p = 0.0374, p = 0.007, p = 0.0111). observation group's total satisfaction of intensive nursing methods (90.00%) is higher than that of control group (63.33%), the difference was statistically significant (p <0.05).
机译:调查密集护理技巧在临床教学中的影响。方法选择我们学校护理60名学生,随机分为对照组(30例)和观察组(30例)。对照组使用常规护理技能,观察组使用密集护理技能。然后比较欧安组织的得分,临床综合能力的分数和两组训练方法的总满意度。结果两组学生评分在训练前没有显着差异(P> 0.05),欧安查划线评估分数在训练后显着提高。欧安组织在训练前得分比较(p = 0.7219,p = 0.3876,p = 0.9223,p = 0.2434);核心核心仔细评分比较(P = 0.0221,P = 0.0328,P = 0.0000,P = 0.0000)。两组学生的临床综合能力分数在训练前没有显着差异(P> 0.05),培训临床综合能力的评分显着提高。临床综合能力比较在训练前(P = 0.3062,P = 0.9516,P = 0.4420,P = 0.7776);临床综合能力比较训练后(P = 0.0332,P = 0.0374,P = 0.007,P = 0.0111)。观察组的密集护理方法的总满意度(90.00%)高于对照组(63.33%),差异有统计学意义(P <0.05)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号