...
首页> 外文期刊>Pfluegers Archiv: European Journal of Physiology >How to calculate the single-breath nitric oxide diffusing capacity in rabbits.
【24h】

How to calculate the single-breath nitric oxide diffusing capacity in rabbits.

机译:如何计算家兔单呼吸一氧化氮扩散能力。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Nitric oxide (NO) is a novel indicator gas for investigating alveolar capillary gas exchange conditions. In clinical practice, pulmonary gas uptake is determined by measuring the single-breath diffusing capacity (DL,NO). Different algorithms are employed to calculate DL,NO. To compare the accuracy of those most commonly used, we performed single-breath experiments on 12 artificially ventilated rabbits. In each animal four manoeuvres, executing breath-holds of 2, 4, 6 and 8 s, were carried out. In each case we administered 55 ml of an indicator gas mixture containing 0.05% NO. Alveolar gas was analysed by respiratory mass spectrometry. The two algorithms for calculating DL,NO based on the conventional solution of the breath-holding equation [Ogilvie et al. (1957) J Clin Invest 36:1-17 and Jones and Meade (1961) Q J Exp Physiol 46:131-143], were compared with the three-equation technique [Graham et al. (1980) IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 27:221-227] as the reference. The deviation between DL,NO calculated from the conventional methods and the reference decreased linearly with increasing duration of NO uptake (deltat). The mean deviations declined from 16.6% (Jones and Meade) or 7.7% (Ogilvie) at deltat=4 s to 5.7% (Jones and Meade) or 2.4% (Ogilvie) at deltat=10 s. The larger mean values are due to the conventional solution where three-tenths of the inflation time is subtracted from deltat. These findings qualify the common prediction that the latter method yields DL,NO values of the highest accuracy. We therefore recommend Ogilvie's procedure if the three-equation technique cannot be employed.
机译:一氧化氮(NO)是用于调查肺泡毛细气体交换条件的新型指示剂气体。在临床实践中,通过测量单次呼吸扩散能力(DL,NO)确定肺部气体摄入量。采用不同的算法来计算DL,NO。为了比较最常用的准确性,我们对12只人工通风的兔子进行了单口呼吸实验。在每只动物中进行四次动作,屏住呼吸2、4、6和8 s。在每种情况下,我们都使用55 ml的含有0.05%NO的指示剂气体混合物。通过呼吸质谱分析肺泡气体。基于屏气方程的常规解,两种用于计算DL,NO的算法[Ogilvie et al。 (1957)J Clin Invest 36:1-17和Jones and Meade(1961)Q J Exp Physiol 46:131-143]与三方程技术进行了比较[Graham et al。(2006)。 (1980)IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 27:221-227]作为参考。常规方法计算的DL,NO与参考值之间的偏差随着NO吸收持续时间(deltat)的增加而线性减小。平均偏差从deltat = 4 s时的16.6%(琼斯和米德)或7.7%(Ogilvie)下降到deltat = 10 s时的5.7%(Jones和Meade)或2.4%(Ogilvie)。较大的平均值归因于常规解决方案,其中从增量中减去了十分之三的充气时间。这些发现符合通常的预测,即后一种方法可产生最高准确度的DL,NO值。因此,如果不能采用三方程技术,我们建议使用Ogilvie的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号