...
首页> 外文期刊>Pattern Recognition: The Journal of the Pattern Recognition Society >Weighted matchings for dense stereo correspondence
【24h】

Weighted matchings for dense stereo correspondence

机译:加权匹配以实现密集的立体声对应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The calculation of matches between pixels, points, or other features in stereo images is known as the correspondence problem. This problem is ill-posed due to occlusions; not every pixel, point or feature in one stereo image has a match in the other. Minimization of a cost function over some local region and dynamic programming algorithms are two well-known strategies for computing dense correspondences. However the former approach fails in regions of low texture, while the latter imposes an ordering constraint which is not always satisfied in stereo images. In this study, we present two new techniques for computing dense stereo correspondence. The new methods are based on combinatorial optimization techniques which require polynomial computation time. The first method casts the selection of matches as the assignment problem, solved efficiently by finding a maximum weighted matching on a bipartite graph. The second is a greedy algorithm which computes suboptimal weighted matchings on the bipartite graphs. Both methods use occlusion nodes when no matches exist. The resulting disparity maps have desirable properties such as dense correspondence, while avoiding the drawbacks associated with ordering constraints. Three existing matching approaches are also reviewed for comparative purposes. We test all five techniques on real and synthetic stereo images using performance criteria which specifically measure occlusion detection. (C) 2000 Pattern Recognition Society. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. [References: 28]
机译:立体图像中像素,点或其他特征之间的匹配计算被称为对应问题。由于遮挡,此问题不适当地解决。并非一个立体图像中的每个像素,点或特征在另一个立体图像中都具有匹配项。在某些局部区域上最小化成本函数和动态编程算法是用于计算密集对应关系的两种众所周知的策略。然而,前一种方法在低纹理的区域中失败,而后一种方法施加了在立体图像中并不总是能够满足的排序约束。在这项研究中,我们提出了两种用于计算密集立体声对应关系的新技术。新方法基于需要多项式计算时间的组合优化技术。第一种方法将匹配项的选择作为分配问题,通过在二分图中找到最大加权匹配项来有效解决。第二种是贪婪算法,该算法在二部图上计算次优加权匹配。当不存在匹配项时,两种方法都使用遮挡节点。所得的视差图具有所需的属性,例如密集的对应关系,同时避免了与排序约束相关的缺点。为了比较目的,还审查了三种现有的匹配方法。我们使用性能标准(具体用于测量遮挡检测)在真实和合成立体图像上测试所有五种技术。 (C)2000模式识别学会。由Elsevier Science Ltd.出版。保留所有权利。 [参考:28]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号