...
首页> 外文期刊>Peanut Science >Sensory comparison of runner peanut market grades from selected varieties
【24h】

Sensory comparison of runner peanut market grades from selected varieties

机译:选定品种的转轮花生市场等级的感官比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Peanut processors have often inquired about the sensory quality difference between market grades. A literature search indicates that information on this subject is not directly available nor uniformly presented. Where statistical tests were applied,larger size grades of peanuts generally were measurably superior in flavor to those of the smallest size grade (Jumbo Runner or Virginia extra large kernels and medium versus No.l). However, in none of the cited studies did panelists make paired comparisons of different grades of peanuts to determine whether the difference in flavor was discernable. In this study, a triangle comparison testing was used to determine if trained panelists could discern a flavor difference between adjacent grades of runnerpeanuts and the sensory attributes that might contribute to discernment. Discernment was attained in four out of 10 combinations: Jumbo Runnerversus medium kernels of Florida MDR 98 and all three comparisons of medium versus No. 1. When the flavor datawere pooled across combinations, panelists were able to correctly discern the difference between Jumbo Runner and Medium kernels 49 percent of the time (P < 0.05) and between medium and No. 1 kernels 90 percent of the time (P < 0.01). The adjusted mean sensory scores were significantly different among the three grades for fruity and sweet attributes but not for roasted peanut or bitter due to the presence of interaction between kernel size and genotype. The flavor intensity range between medium and No.1 kernels for fruity and sweet was greater than 0.5 units. This difference is probably the reason why panelists were able to correctly discern between them 90 percent of the time. The basis for this discernment between Jumbo Runner and medium kernels appeared to be differences in bitterness, but the direction of the difference was not consistent across genotypes.
机译:花生加工商经常询问市场等级之间的感官质量差异。文献检索表明,关于该主题的信息无法直接获得,也无法统一提供。在进行统计测试的地方,较大规格等级的花生通常在味道上要比最小规格等级的花生好(Jumbo Runner或Virginia超大粒,中等比1号)。但是,在所有引用的研究中,没有小组成员对不同等级的花生进行成对比较,以确定风味差异是否可辨别。在这项研究中,使用了一个三角形比较测试来确定受过训练的小组成员是否可以识别相邻等级的花栗子之间的风味差异以及可能有助于识别的感官属性。在10种组合中的4种中获得了识别:佛罗里达MDR 98的Jumbo Runnerversus中粒以及中号与No.1的所有三个比较。当将风味数据汇总到各种组合中时,小组成员能够正确地辨别Jumbo Runner和Medium之间的差异。玉米粒的百分率是49%(P <0.05),中等至1号玉米粒的百分率是90%(P <0.01)。调整后的平均感官评分在三个等级的水果和甜味属性之间存在显着差异,但对于烤花生或苦味则没有差异,这是由于籽粒大小和基因型之间存在相互作用。果味和甜味的中等至第一核之间的风味强度范围大于0.5个单位。这种差异可能是小组成员能够在90%的时间内正确识别他们的原因。在Jumbo Runner和中等粒之间进行区分的基础似乎是苦味的差异,但差异的方向在各个基因型之间并不一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号