首页> 外文期刊>Soil Science >Comparison of methods for nutrient measurement in calcareous soils: Ion-exchange resin bag, capsule, membrane, and chemical extractions
【24h】

Comparison of methods for nutrient measurement in calcareous soils: Ion-exchange resin bag, capsule, membrane, and chemical extractions

机译:石灰性土壤中养分测量方法的比较:离子交换树脂袋,胶囊,膜和化学提取物

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Four methods for measuring quantities of 12 plant-available nutrients were compared using three sandy soils in a series of three experiments. Three of the methods use different ion-exchange resin forms-bags, capsules, and membranes-and the fourth was conventional chemical extraction. The first experiment compared nutrient extraction data from a medium of sand saturated with a nutrient solution. The second and third experiments used Nakai and Sheppard series soils from Canyonlands National Park, which are relatively high in soil carbonates. The second experiment compared nutrient extraction data provided by the four methods from soils equilibrated at two temperatures, "warm" and "cold." The third experiment extracted nutrients from the same soils in a field equilibration. Our results show that the four extraction techniques are not comparable. This conclusion is due to differences among the methods in the net quantities of nutrients extracted from equivalent soil volumes, in the proportional representation of nutrients within similar soils and treatments, in the measurement of nutrients that were added in known quantities, and even in the order of nutrients ranked by net abundance. We attribute the disparities in nutrient measurement among the different resin forms to interacting effects of the inherent differences in resin exchange capacity, differences among nutrients in their resin affinities, and possibly the relatively short equilibration time for laboratory trials. One constraint for measuring carbonate-related nutrients in high-carbonate soils is the conventional ammonium acetate extraction method, which we suspect of dissolving fine CaCO3 particles that are more abundant in Nakai series soils, resulting in erroneously high Ca2+ estimates. For study of plant-available nutrients, it is important to identify the nutrients of foremost interest and understand differences in their resin sorption dynamics to determine the most appropriate extraction method.
机译:在一系列三个实验中,使用三种沙质土壤比较了四种测量12种植物可用养分含量的方法。三种方法使用不同的离子交换树脂形式-袋,胶囊和膜-第四种是常规化学提取。第一个实验比较了从用营养液饱和的沙子中提取养分的数据。第二和第三次实验使用了峡谷地国家公园的Nakai和Sheppard系列土壤,这些土壤碳酸盐含量较高。第二个实验比较了四种方法从“温暖”和“寒冷”两个温度下平衡的土壤中提取的养分数据。第三个实验通过田间平衡从相同的土壤中提取养分。我们的结果表明,四种提取技术不可比。该结论归因于以下方法之间的差异:从等效土壤体积中提取的养分净量,相似土壤和处理中养分的比例表示,在已知数量甚至顺序添加的养分的测量中营养成分按净丰度排序。我们将不同树脂形式之间养分测量的差异归因于树脂交换容量固有差异,树脂亲和力之间养分差异的相互作用,以及实验室试验可能需要相对较短的平衡时间。测量高碳酸盐土壤中与碳酸盐相关的养分的一个制约因素是常规的乙酸铵萃取法,我们怀疑这会溶解Nakai系列土壤中含量更高的细CaCO3颗粒,从而导致错误地估计高的Ca2 +。对于植物可用营养素的研究,重要的是要确定最重要的营养素并了解其树脂吸附动力学的差异,以确定最合适的提取方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号