...
首页> 外文期刊>Organic Geochemistry: A Publication of the International Association of Geochemistry and Cosmochemistry >Comparison of XAD with other dissolved lignin isolation techniques and a compilation of analytical improvements for the analysis of lignin in aquatic settings
【24h】

Comparison of XAD with other dissolved lignin isolation techniques and a compilation of analytical improvements for the analysis of lignin in aquatic settings

机译:XAD与其他溶解性木质素分离技术的比较以及水生环境中木质素分析的分析改进汇编

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This manuscript highlights numerous incremental improvements in dissolved lignin measurements over the nearly three decades since CuO oxidation of lignin phenols was first adapted for environmental samples. Intercomparison of the recovery efficiency of three common lignin phenol concentration and isolation techniques, namely XAD, C-18 with both CH3OH (C18M) and CH3CN (C(18)A) used independently for priming and elution steps, and tangential flow filtration (TFF) for a range of aquatic samples including fresh, estuarine and marine waters, was undertaken. With freshwater samples XAD8-1, C18M and TFF were all observed to recover ca. 80-90% of the lignin phenols and showed no fractionation effects with respect to diagnostic lignin parameters. With estuarine and marine samples more lignin phenols were recovered with C18M and XAD8-1 than TFF because of the increased prevalence of low molecular weight lignin phenols in marine influenced samples. For marine systems, differences were also observed between diagnostic lignin parameters isolated via TFF vs. C18M and XAD8-1 as a result of the high molecular weight lignin phenols being less degraded than the bulk. Therefore, it is recommended for future studies of marine systems that only one technique is utilized for ease of intercomparison within studies. It is suggested that for studies solely aimed at recovering bulk dissolved lignin in marine environments that C18M and XAD8-1 appear to be more suitable than TFF as they recover more lignin. Our results highlight that, for freshwater samples, all three common lignin phenol concentration and isolation techniques are comparable to whole water concentrated by rotary evaporation (i.e. not isolated) but, that for marine systems, the choice of concentration and isolation techniques needs to be taken into consideration with respect to both lignin concentration and diagnostic parameters. Finally, as the study highlights XAD8-1 to be a suitable method for the isolation of dissolved lignin phenols from aquatic systems (statistically indistinguishable from C18M, P < 0.1), lignin data representative of whole waters can be produced for IHSS reference materials or other XAD sample archives. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:该手稿强调了自从木质素酚的CuO氧化首次适用于环境样品以来,近三十年来在溶解木质素测量方面的大量改进。比较三种常见的木质素酚浓度和分离技术的回收效率,即XAD,C-18与CH3OH(C18M)和CH3CN(C(18)A)分别用于引发和洗脱步骤以及切向流过滤(TFF) )进行了一系列水生样品的研究,包括淡水,河口和海水。对于淡水样品,XAD8-1,C18M和TFF均能回收到约200mg / ml。 80-90%的木质素酚,相对于诊断性木质素参数没有分馏作用。在河口和海洋样品中,C18M和XAD8-1回收的木质素酚比TFF多,这是因为低分子量木质素酚在海洋影响的样品中的普及率增加。对于海洋系统,由于高分子量木质素酚的降解程度不及大分子木质素酚,因此通过TFF与C18M和XAD8-1分离得到的诊断木质素参数之间也存在差异。因此,建议在未来的海洋系统研究中,仅使用一种技术来简化研究之间的比对。建议仅在海洋环境中回收大量溶解的木质素的研究表明,C18M和XAD8-1比TFF更适合,因为它们可以回收更多的木质素。我们的结果表明,对于淡水样品,所有三种常见的木质素酚浓缩和分离技术都可与通过旋转蒸发浓缩的全水(即未分离)相媲美,但对于海洋系统,则需要选择浓缩和分离技术考虑到木质素浓度和诊断参数。最后,由于该研究强调XAD8-1是从水生系统中分离溶解的木质素酚的合适方法(统计上与C18M无区别,P <0.1),因此可以为IHSS参考材料或其他指标生成代表全水的木质素数据。 XAD示例档案。 (C)2010 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号