...
首页> 外文期刊>Oncology: International Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment >Safety and efficacy of sorafenib in elderly patients treated in the North American advanced renal cell carcinoma sorafenib expanded access program.
【24h】

Safety and efficacy of sorafenib in elderly patients treated in the North American advanced renal cell carcinoma sorafenib expanded access program.

机译:索拉非尼在北美晚期肾细胞癌索拉非尼扩大治疗方案中治疗的老年患者的安全性和有效性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: In this retrospective analysis of the Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Sorafenib (ARCCS) program in North America, we compared the safety and efficacy of sorafenib in patients aged >/=70 with those aged <70 years. METHODS: Patients were treated with oral sorafenib twice daily until the occurrence of disease progression or treatment intolerance. The primary objective of the ARCCS program was making sorafenib available to patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in the USA and Canada before marketing approval was obtained; the secondary objective was the evaluation of its safety and efficacy. RESULTS: Of the 2,504 patients enrolled in the ARCCS program who received at least 1 dose of sorafenib, 736 (29%) were aged >/=70 years. The most common grade >/=3 adverse events included rash/desquamation (5% in both groups), hand-foot skin reaction (8% in those aged >/=70 years vs. 10% in those <70 years of age), hypertension (5 vs. 4%) and fatigue (7 vs. 4%). Partial response was seen in 4% of the patients in both age groups. The median overall survival for the >/=70-year versus <70-year groups was also similar (46 vs. 50 weeks). CONCLUSIONS: There were no substantial differences in safety and efficacy between patients aged >/=70 and <70 years with advanced RCC treated with sorafenib.
机译:目的:在对北美晚期肾细胞癌索拉非尼(ARCCS)计划的回顾性分析中,我们比较了索拉非尼在> / = 70岁患者与<70岁患者中的安全性和有效性。方法:每天两次口服索拉非尼治疗患者,直到疾病进展或治疗不耐受为止。 ARCCS计划的主要目标是在获得市场批准之前,在美国和加拿大向索拉非尼提供用于晚期肾细胞癌(RCC)的患者。次要目标是评估其安全性和有效性。结果:参加ARCCS计划的2,504名患者接受了至少1剂量的索拉非尼,其中736名(29%)年龄≥70岁。最常见的> / = 3级不良事件包括皮疹/脱皮(两组均为5%),手足皮肤反应(> / = 70岁的人群为8%,<70岁的人群为10%) ,高血压(5 vs. 4%)和疲劳(7 vs. 4%)。在两个年龄组中,都有4%的患者出现部分反应。 > / = 70年组与<70年组的中位总生存期也相似(46周与50周)。结论:在索拉非尼治疗的> / = 70岁和<70岁的晚期RCC患者之间,安全性和疗效无实质性差异。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号