...
首页> 外文期刊>RMZ/Materials and Geoenvironment >Analysis of alternatives for the long term management of excess mercury
【24h】

Analysis of alternatives for the long term management of excess mercury

机译:分析过量汞的长期管理的替代方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio USA This paper describes a systematic method for comparing options for the long-term management,of surplus elemental mercury in the U.S., using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) as embodied in commercially available Expert Choice software. A limited scope multi-criteria decision-analysis was performed. Two (2) general types of treatment technologies were evaluated (stabilization/ amalgamation and selenide), combined with four (4) disposal options: a) hazardous waste landfill; b) hazardous waste monofill; c) engineered below-ground structure; and d) mined cavity. In addition, three storage options for elemental mercury were considered: a) aboveground structure; b) hardened structure; and c) mined cavity. Alternatives were evaluated against criteria that included costs, environmental performance, compliance with current regulations, implementation considerations, technology maturity, potential risks to the public and workers, and public perception. Considering non-cost criteria only, the three storage options rank most favorably. If both cost and other criteria are considered, then landfill options are preferred, because they are the least expensive ones. Storage options ranked unfavorably on cost because: a) even relatively small per annum costs will add up over time; and b) storage is a temporary solution and, sooner or later, a treatment and disposal technology will be adopted, which adds to the cost. However, the analysis supports continued storage for a short period (up to a few decades) followed by permanent retirement when treatment technologies have matured. Suggestions for future work include: a) involving additional stakeholders in the process, b) evaluating alternatives for mercury-containing wastes rather than for elemental mercury only, c) revisiting the analysis periodically to determine if changes are required, d) conducting uncertainty analyses utilizing Monte-Carlo-based techniques.
机译:美国环境保护局,美国俄亥俄州辛辛那提市本文介绍了一种系统方法,该方法使用市售专家选择软件中包含的分析层次方法(AHP),对美国剩余元素汞的长期管理方案进行比较。进行了有限范围的多标准决策分析。评估了两(2)种常规处理技术(稳定/汞齐和硒化物),并结合了四(4)种处理方案:a)危险废物掩埋场; b)危险废物填充料c)工程地下结构; d)矿洞。此外,考虑了三种元素汞的储存选择:a)地上结构; b)硬化结构; c)矿洞。根据包括成本,环境绩效,对当前法规的遵守情况,实施注意事项,技术成熟度,对公众和工人的潜在风险以及公众认知度在内的标准对替代方案进行了评估。仅考虑非成本标准,这三个存储选项的排名最为有利。如果同时考虑成本和其他标准,则首选填埋场,因为它们是最便宜的选择。存储选项在成本上排名不利,原因是:a)即使是相对较小的年成本,也会随着时间的推移而增加; b)储存是一个临时解决方案,迟早将采用处理和处置技术,这增加了成本。但是,该分析支持在短期内(长达数十年)继续存储,然后在处理技术成熟后永久退役。对未来工作的建议包括:a)在过程中让更多的利益相关者参与; b)评估含汞废物的替代品而不是仅针对元素汞的替代品; c)定期重新进行分析以确定是否需要进行改变; d)利用不确定性进行分析基于蒙特卡洛的技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号