...
首页> 外文期刊>Radiotherapy and oncology: Journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology >Localized squamous-cell cancer of the esophagus: retrospective analysis of three treatment schedules.
【24h】

Localized squamous-cell cancer of the esophagus: retrospective analysis of three treatment schedules.

机译:食管局部鳞状细胞癌:三种治疗方案的回顾性分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A retrospective study comparing chemotherapy and radiation, esophagectomy alone versus preoperative radiochemotherapy and surgery in localized squamous-cell esophageal carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1989 and 1995, 139 patients (40 stage I, 77 stage IIA and 22 stage IIB according to the UICC 78 TNM classification) were treated in two different institutions. They were divided into three groups according to the treatment proposed: E group (treatment by esophagectomy; n = 30), RCT+E group (treatment by preoperative radiochemotherapy and esophagectomy; n = 46), RCT group (treatment by radiochemotherapy; n = 63). Factors like age, tumor localization and stage were similar in all groups. An intention to treat analysis was made. RESULTS: The E group showed no postoperative mortality, while in the RCT+E group, the surgery mortality was 12.8%. The mortality after RCT was 1.7%. After preoperative radiochemotherapy, a pathological complete response was observed in 25% of cases and the curative resection rate was higher (82% after RCT + E versus 60% after E). The 5-year survival difference between the three groups was not relevant (E group, 12.6%; RCT group, 25.8%; RCT + E group, 38.7%). The median survival was 29, 24 and 28.5 months, respectively. The event-free survival was identical for the E group and the RCT group. For patients treated by radiochemotherapy, local and/or distant relapses were significantly reduced by esophagectomy (relapses occurred in 51% of patients in the RCT + E group versus 75% in the RCT group, P = 0.017). Palliative care (dilatations, prosthesis, gastrostomy or jejunostomy) to improve dysphagia was necessary for 38% of patients treated by exclusive radiochemotherapy versus 11% of patients treated by surgery (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Treatments by esophagectomy or radiochemotherapy were not significantly different. Preoperative radiochemotherapy and surgery lead to a higher survival rate than exclusive radiochemotherapy, however, with a high postoperative mortality rate. This study suggests the relevance of a prospective randomized trial to compare RCT+E and RCT alone.
机译:背景与目的:回顾性研究比较了局部鳞状上皮食管癌的化疗和放疗,单纯食管切除术与术前放化疗和手术的关系。材料与方法:在1989年至1995年之间,在两个不同的机构中对139例患者(根据UICC 78 TNM分类标准分别为I期40例,IIA 77例和IIB 22例)。根据建议的治疗方法将它们分为三组:E组(食管切除术治疗; n = 30),RCT + E组(术前放射化学疗法和食管切除术治疗; n = 46),RCT组(放射化学治疗; n = 63)。年龄,肿瘤定位和分期等因素在所有组中均相似。进行治疗分析的意图。结果:E组无术后死亡率,而RCT + E组的手术死亡率为12.8%。 RCT后的死亡率为1.7%。术前放化疗后,在25%的病例中观察到病理完全缓解,治愈率更高(RCT + E后为82%,E后为60%)。三组之间的5年生存率差异无关(E组为12.6%; RCT组为25.8%; RCT + E组为38.7%)。中位生存期分别为29、24和28.5个月。 E组和RCT组的无事件生存率相同。对于经放射化学疗法治疗的患者,通过食管切除术可显着降低局部和/或远处复发(RCT + E组中51%的患者发生复发,而RCT组中75%的患者发生复发,P = 0.017)。仅有38%的单纯放射化学疗法患者需要姑息治疗(扩张,假体,胃造口术或空肠造口术)以改善吞咽困难,而手术治疗的患者为11%(P = 0.001)。结论:食管切除术或放化疗的治疗无显着差异。术前放化疗和手术比单纯放疗有更高的生存率,但是术后死亡率却很高。这项研究表明前瞻性随机试验比较RCT + E和单独进行RCT的相关性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号