...
首页> 外文期刊>Radiotherapy and oncology: Journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology >Local control with conventional and hypofractionated adjuvant radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in-situ.
【24h】

Local control with conventional and hypofractionated adjuvant radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in-situ.

机译:保留乳腺导管原位癌手术后常规和低剂量辅助放疗的局部控制。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: Adjuvant whole breast radiotherapy (WBRT) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) improves local control, however an optimal dose fractionation remains undefined. WBRT following breast-conserving surgery for invasive breast cancer demonstrates equivalent efficacy and morbidity for conventional and hypofractionated treatment. Our group policy allowed for the use of both schedules, therefore we compared local control in women with DCIS following breast-conserving surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred and sixty-six patients treated between January 1999 and December 2004 with conventional (50Gy in 25 fractions) or hypofractionated (42.4Gy in 16 fractions or 40Gy/16+12.5Gy boost) WBRT after breast-conserving surgery for DCIS were retrospectively reviewed. Median follow-up was 3.76years (range 0.1-8.9 years). RESULTS: One hundred and four patients (39%) were treated with conventional and 162 (61%) with hypofractionated WBRT. The median age was 56.7 years (range 32.2-83.8 years), and prognostic features were well matched in both groups, apart from a small increase in tumour size in the conventional arm (1.75 vs. 2.12 cm, p=0.05). Actuarial risk of recurrence at 4 years was 7% with hypofractionated WBRT and 6% with the conventional schedule (p=0.9). Univariate analysis showed an increased risk of recurrence with high nuclear grade tumours (11% at 4 years for grade 3 vs. 4% for grade 1/2, p=0.029). CONCLUSIONS: Hypofractionated adjuvant WBRT following breast-conserving surgery for DCIS has comparable local control to a conventional radiation schedule. Hypofractionated WBRT is more convenient for patients, has equivalent morbidity and should be considered in this patient group.
机译:目的:导管原位癌(DCIS)辅助全乳放疗(WBRT)可改善局部控制,但最佳剂量分割仍不确定。保乳手术治疗浸润性乳腺癌后的WBRT表现出与常规治疗和低剂量治疗相当的疗效和发病率。我们的团体政策允许同时使用这两种时间表,因此我们比较了保乳手术后DCIS妇女的局部控制。患者和方法:1999年1月至2004年12月间,有266例患者在保乳手术后接受常规(25份50Gy)或超分割(16份42.4Gy或40Gy / 16 + 12.5Gy增强)WBRT治疗,回顾了DCIS。中位随访时间为3。76年(范围0。1-8。9年)。结果:104例患者(39%)接受了常规治疗,162例患者(61%)接受了普通的WBRT治疗。中位年龄为56.7岁(范围为32.2-83.8岁),并且两组的预后特征均相符,除了常规组的肿瘤大小略有增加(1.75比2.12 cm,p = 0.05)。分级放疗的WBRT在4年时复发的精算风险为7%,常规方案为6%(p = 0.9)。单因素分析显示,高核级肿瘤复发的风险增加(3年级4年为11%,1/2级为4%,p = 0.029)。结论:DCIS保乳手术后的超分割辅助WBRT具有与常规放疗时间表相当的局部控制。超分割WBRT对患者更方便,具有相同的发病率,应在此患者组中考虑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号