首页> 外文期刊>Radiotherapy and oncology: Journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology >Adjuvant radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy for pathologic T3 or margin-positive prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
【24h】

Adjuvant radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy for pathologic T3 or margin-positive prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机译:前列腺癌根治术后根治性T3或边缘阳性前列腺癌的辅助放疗:系统评价和荟萃分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Results following radical prostatectomy (RP) are suboptimal in patients found to have cancer extending beyond the prostatic capsule (pT3) or present at the resection margins (R1). The optimal postoperative management of such patients is undefined. Therapeutic alternatives include adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) or active surveillance. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were eligible for inclusion in this systematic review if they compared adjuvant RT in the immediate period after RP to active surveillance - with therapies held in reserve for salvage - in prostate cancer patients with pT3 or R1 disease or both. The primary outcome of interest was overall survival. RESULTS: Three RCTs representing 1743 patients satisfied the eligibility criteria. Two trials reported data on overall survival; a meta-analysis of the data showed no significant improvement associated with adjuvant RT (hazard ratio=0.91, 95% CI 0.67-1.22, p=0.52). All trials reported data on biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS). On meta-analysis, adjuvant RT significantly improved bPFS (hazard ratio=0.47, 95% CI 0.40-0.56, p0.00001). One trial provided comparative graded toxicity data; there were no significant differences between arms in severe (grade 3) gastrointestinal or genitourinary toxicity at five years. CONCLUSIONS: To date, adjuvant RT has not been shown to improve overall survival compared with active surveillance. Longer follow-up from completed RCTs is required to accurately assess this outcome. Adjuvant RT does, however, significantly improve bPFS and is not associated with excess severe late toxicity.
机译:背景与目的:发现癌症已超过前列腺包膜(pT3)或切除边缘(R1)的患者,进行根治性前列腺切除术(RP)后的结果欠佳。这类患者的最佳术后处理尚不确定。治疗选择包括辅助放疗(RT)或主动监视。方法:如果将pT3或R1疾病或两者兼而有之的前列腺癌患者在RP与主动监测后的辅助RT进行比较(保留挽救的疗法)中进行比较,则随机对照试验(RCT)有资格纳入本系统评价。感兴趣的主要结果是总体存活率。结果:代表1743名患者的3项RCT符合入选标准。两项试验报告了总体生存率的数据。数据的荟萃分析显示与佐剂放疗无明显改善(危险比= 0.91,95%CI 0.67-1.22,p = 0.52)。所有试验均报告了有关无生化无进展生存期(bPFS)的数据。荟萃分析显示,辅助放疗显着改善了bPFS(危险比= 0.47,95%CI 0.40-0.56,p <0.00001)。一项试验提供了比较的分级毒性数据; 5年时,在严重(3级)胃肠道或泌尿生殖系统毒性方面,两组之间无显着差异。结论:迄今为止,与主动监测相比,辅助放疗尚无改善总生存的证据。需要对完成的RCT进行更长的随访,才能准确评估此结果。但是,佐剂RT确实可以显着改善bPFS,并且与严重的晚期毒性无关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号