...
首页> 外文期刊>Radiotherapy and oncology: Journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology >A quantitative image quality comparison of four different image guided radiotherapy devices.
【24h】

A quantitative image quality comparison of four different image guided radiotherapy devices.

机译:四种不同图像引导放射治疗设备的定量图像质量比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: A study to quantitatively compare the image quality of four different image guided radiotherapy (IGRT) devices based on phantom measurements with respect to the additional dose delivered to the patient. METHODS: Images of three different head-sized phantoms (diameter 16-18 cm) were acquired with the following four IGRT-CT solutions: (i) the Siemens Primatom single slice fan beam computed tomography (CT) scanner with an acceleration voltage of 130 kV, (ii) a Tomotherapy HI-ART II unit using a fan beam scanner with an energy of 3.5 MeV and (iii) the Siemens Artiste prototype, providing the possibility to perform kV (121 kV) and MV (6 MV) cone beam (CB) CTs. For each device three scan protocols (named low, normal, high) were selected to yield the same weighted computed tomography dose index (CTDI(w)). Based on the individual inserts of the different phantoms the image quality achieved with each device at a certain dose level was characterized in terms of homogeneity, spatial resolution, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and electron density-to-CT-number conversion. RESULTS: Based on the current findings for head-sized phantoms all devices show an electron density-to-CT-number conversion almost independent of the imaging parameters and hence can be suited for treatment planning purposes. The evaluation of the image quality, however, points out clear differences due to the different energies and geometries. The Primatom standard CT scanner shows throughout the best performance, especially for soft tissue contrast and spatial resolution with low imaging doses. Reasonable soft tissue contrast can be obtained with slightly higher doses compared to the CT scanner with the kVCB and the Tomotherapy unit. In order to get similar results with the MVCB system a much higher dose needs to be applied to the patient. CONCLUSION: Considering the entire investigations, especially in terms of contrast and spatial resolution, a rough tendency for decreasing image quality can be given: Primatom, Artiste prototype kVCB, Tomotherapy, Artiste prototype MVCB.
机译:目的:一项研究,基于幻像测量,相对于输送给患者的额外剂量,定量比较四种不同的图像引导放射治疗(IGRT)设备的图像质量。方法:通过以下四种IGRT-CT解决方案获取了三种不同头部尺寸的幻像(直径16-18 cm)的图像:(i)西门子Primatom单层扇形束计算机断层摄影(CT)扫描仪,加速电压为130 kV,(ii)使用能量为3.5 MeV的扇形束扫描仪的Tomotherapy HI-ART II装置,以及(iii)Siemens Artiste原型,提供执行kV(121 kV)和MV(6 MV)锥形束的可能性(CB)CT。对于每个设备,选择三种扫描方案(分别命名为低,正常,高)以产生相同的加权计算机断层摄影剂量指数(CTDI(w))。根据不同体模的各个插入物,以均一性,空间分辨率,信噪比(SNR),对比噪声比(CNR)来表征每种设备在一定剂量水平下获得的图像质量。和电子密度到CT数的转换。结果:根据目前对头部大小的体模的发现,所有设备均显示出电子密度至CT数的转换,几乎与成像参数无关,因此可以适合治疗计划的目的。但是,对图像质量的评估指出,由于不同的能量和几何形状,存在明显的差异。 Primatom标准CT扫描仪显示出最佳性能,特别是对于低成像剂量的软组织对比和空间分辨率。与具有kVCB和Tomotherapy装置的CT扫描仪相比,以稍高的剂量可以获得合理的软组织对比。为了获得与MVCB系统相似的结果,需要向患者施加更高的剂量。结论:考虑到整个研究,特别是在对比度和空间分辨率方面,可以给出降低图像质量的大致趋势:Primatom,Artiste原型kVCB,Tomotherapy,Artiste原型MVCB。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号